Merge "Refactor ProductConfigProperties to use a struct key instead of an string key with hardcoded patterns." am: 59a5cb072b am: 7f98f45ff8 am: b8dc51a5cc am: 501f02c3d0

Original change: https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/build/soong/+/1892222

Change-Id: I6f52e72d08dd18a2edd2aa695b94211caddce7cd
This commit is contained in:
Treehugger Robot
2021-11-16 05:55:00 +00:00
committed by Automerger Merge Worker
4 changed files with 146 additions and 49 deletions

View File

@@ -320,14 +320,14 @@ func (ca *compilerAttributes) convertProductVariables(ctx android.BazelConversio
"CppFlags": &ca.cppFlags,
}
for propName, attr := range productVarPropNameToAttribute {
if props, exists := productVariableProps[propName]; exists {
for _, prop := range props {
flags, ok := prop.Property.([]string)
if productConfigProps, exists := productVariableProps[propName]; exists {
for productConfigProp, prop := range productConfigProps {
flags, ok := prop.([]string)
if !ok {
ctx.ModuleErrorf("Could not convert product variable %s property", proptools.PropertyNameForField(propName))
}
newFlags, _ := bazel.TryVariableSubstitutions(flags, prop.ProductConfigVariable)
attr.SetSelectValue(prop.ConfigurationAxis(), prop.FullConfig, newFlags)
newFlags, _ := bazel.TryVariableSubstitutions(flags, productConfigProp.Name)
attr.SetSelectValue(productConfigProp.ConfigurationAxis(), productConfigProp.SelectKey(), newFlags)
}
}
}
@@ -587,31 +587,35 @@ func (la *linkerAttributes) convertProductVariables(ctx android.BazelConversionP
if !exists && !excludesExists {
continue
}
// collect all the configurations that an include or exclude property exists for.
// we want to iterate all configurations rather than either the include or exclude because for a
// particular configuration we may have only and include or only an exclude to handle
configs := make(map[string]bool, len(props)+len(excludeProps))
for config := range props {
configs[config] = true
// Collect all the configurations that an include or exclude property exists for.
// We want to iterate all configurations rather than either the include or exclude because, for a
// particular configuration, we may have either only an include or an exclude to handle.
productConfigProps := make(map[android.ProductConfigProperty]bool, len(props)+len(excludeProps))
for p := range props {
productConfigProps[p] = true
}
for config := range excludeProps {
configs[config] = true
for p := range excludeProps {
productConfigProps[p] = true
}
for config := range configs {
prop, includesExists := props[config]
excludesProp, excludesExists := excludeProps[config]
for productConfigProp := range productConfigProps {
prop, includesExists := props[productConfigProp]
excludesProp, excludesExists := excludeProps[productConfigProp]
var includes, excludes []string
var ok bool
// if there was no includes/excludes property, casting fails and that's expected
if includes, ok = prop.Property.([]string); includesExists && !ok {
if includes, ok = prop.([]string); includesExists && !ok {
ctx.ModuleErrorf("Could not convert product variable %s property", name)
}
if excludes, ok = excludesProp.Property.([]string); excludesExists && !ok {
if excludes, ok = excludesProp.([]string); excludesExists && !ok {
ctx.ModuleErrorf("Could not convert product variable %s property", dep.excludesField)
}
dep.attribute.SetSelectValue(prop.ConfigurationAxis(), config, dep.depResolutionFunc(ctx, android.FirstUniqueStrings(includes), excludes))
dep.attribute.SetSelectValue(
productConfigProp.ConfigurationAxis(),
productConfigProp.SelectKey(),
dep.depResolutionFunc(ctx, android.FirstUniqueStrings(includes), excludes),
)
}
}
}