Stop requiring apex_available on java_library members of sdks

Previously, adding java_library to an sdk required that the names of
any APEXes that transitively compiled against it were added to its
apex_available property. This change removes that requirement.

Also corrects the dependency path in the TestApexAvailable_IndirectDep
error which previously passed through "shared from static" static
dependency tags even though those are explicitly NOT followed when
checking apex_available settings.

Bug: 152878661
Test: m droid
Change-Id: I995ed38956c1bc210b09494812de012fed9f9232
This commit is contained in:
Paul Duffin
2020-03-31 15:23:40 +01:00
parent c519244cd5
commit 6534770793
5 changed files with 34 additions and 36 deletions

View File

@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ func RegisterPreDepsMutators(ctx android.RegisterMutatorsContext) {
ctx.BottomUp("SdkMemberInterVersion", memberInterVersionMutator).Parallel()
}
// RegisterPostDepshMutators registers post-deps mutators to support modules implementing SdkAware
// RegisterPostDepsMutators registers post-deps mutators to support modules implementing SdkAware
// interface and the sdk module type. This function has been made public to be called by tests
// outside of the sdk package
func RegisterPostDepsMutators(ctx android.RegisterMutatorsContext) {
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ func sdkDepsReplaceMutator(mctx android.BottomUpMutatorContext) {
}
}
// Step 6: ensure that the dependencies from outside of the APEX are all from the required SDKs
// Step 6: ensure that the dependencies outside of the APEX are all from the required SDKs
func sdkRequirementsMutator(mctx android.TopDownMutatorContext) {
if m, ok := mctx.Module().(interface {
android.DepIsInSameApex
@@ -442,12 +442,20 @@ func sdkRequirementsMutator(mctx android.TopDownMutatorContext) {
return
}
mctx.VisitDirectDeps(func(dep android.Module) {
if mctx.OtherModuleDependencyTag(dep) == android.DefaultsDepTag {
tag := mctx.OtherModuleDependencyTag(dep)
if tag == android.DefaultsDepTag {
// dependency to defaults is always okay
return
}
// If the dep is from outside of the APEX, but is not in any of the
// Ignore the dependency from the unversioned member to any versioned members as an
// apex that depends on the unversioned member will not also be depending on a versioned
// member.
if _, ok := tag.(sdkMemberVersionedDepTag); ok {
return
}
// If the dep is outside of the APEX, but is not in any of the
// required SDKs, we know that the dep is a violation.
if sa, ok := dep.(android.SdkAware); ok {
if !m.DepIsInSameApex(mctx, dep) && !requiredSdks.Contains(sa.ContainingSdk()) {