Stop requiring apex_available on java_library members of sdks
Previously, adding java_library to an sdk required that the names of any APEXes that transitively compiled against it were added to its apex_available property. This change removes that requirement. Also corrects the dependency path in the TestApexAvailable_IndirectDep error which previously passed through "shared from static" static dependency tags even though those are explicitly NOT followed when checking apex_available settings. Bug: 152878661 Bug: 153306490 Test: m droid Merged-In: I995ed38956c1bc210b09494812de012fed9f9232 Change-Id: I995ed38956c1bc210b09494812de012fed9f9232
This commit is contained in:
20
apex/apex.go
20
apex/apex.go
@@ -868,13 +868,23 @@ func apexDepsMutator(mctx android.TopDownMutatorContext) {
|
||||
mctx.VisitDirectDeps(func(child android.Module) {
|
||||
depName := mctx.OtherModuleName(child)
|
||||
if am, ok := child.(android.ApexModule); ok && am.CanHaveApexVariants() &&
|
||||
cur.DepIsInSameApex(mctx, child) {
|
||||
(cur.DepIsInSameApex(mctx, child) || inAnySdk(child)) {
|
||||
android.UpdateApexDependency(apexBundles, depName, directDep)
|
||||
am.BuildForApexes(apexBundles)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If a module in an APEX depends on a module from an SDK then it needs an APEX
|
||||
// specific variant created for it. Refer to sdk.sdkDepsReplaceMutator.
|
||||
func inAnySdk(module android.Module) bool {
|
||||
if sa, ok := module.(android.SdkAware); ok {
|
||||
return sa.IsInAnySdk()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Create apex variations if a module is included in APEX(s).
|
||||
func apexMutator(mctx android.BottomUpMutatorContext) {
|
||||
if am, ok := mctx.Module().(android.ApexModule); ok && am.CanHaveApexVariants() {
|
||||
@@ -1849,6 +1859,14 @@ func (a *apexBundle) checkApexAvailability(ctx android.ModuleContext) {
|
||||
apexName := ctx.ModuleName()
|
||||
fromName := ctx.OtherModuleName(from)
|
||||
toName := ctx.OtherModuleName(to)
|
||||
|
||||
// If `to` is not actually in the same APEX as `from` then it does not need apex_available and neither
|
||||
// do any of its dependencies.
|
||||
if am, ok := from.(android.DepIsInSameApex); ok && !am.DepIsInSameApex(ctx, to) {
|
||||
// As soon as the dependency graph crosses the APEX boundary, don't go further.
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if to.AvailableFor(apexName) || whitelistedApexAvailable(apexName, toName) {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user