Rename the two prefix-in-list funcs so that their usages are clearer.
Also find and replace all the code that essentially does either.
This introduces additional loops in some places, but I think the added
readability and simplicity outweighs the performance degradation, which
should be negligible anyway.
Test: m nothing
Test: TreeHugger
Change-Id: I37e2276ca0c815105ed0031f23c0b1264b480e4f
Bug: 149075752
Test: tapas com.android.conscrypt com.android.tethering arm64
Test: m out/target/product/generic_arm64/{,symbols/}apex/com.android.{tethering,conscrypt}/lib64/libc++.so
Test: Verified that unwinder was dynamically linked to tethering's
Test: libc++ and statically linked to conscrypt's.
Test: lunch flame-userdebug && m
Test: Verified that unwinder was dynamically linked to /system/lib64/libc++.so
Change-Id: I98eed7cb4316962b19b5c12e150c224c25d0e91d
With kernel support being removed for execute-only memory layouts,
remove support for XOM until there's kernel support again.
This allows us to gain the code-size improvements from
"-z noseparate-code".
Bug: 147300048
Test: Compiled binaries no longer marked XOM by default.
Change-Id: Ie84bdd2ca025e8b14867008291bf9ce143b5e999
This is to unify boot jars with system server jars:
PRODUCT_SYSTEM_SERVER_JARS and PRODUCT_UPDATABLE_SYSTEM_SERVER_JARS
do not overlap.
Test: aosp_walleye-userdebug boots
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick.
Bug: 146363577
Change-Id: If001049a46f8e9d38921dabeedbd61e971ebfe73
Merged-In: If001049a46f8e9d38921dabeedbd61e971ebfe73
(cherry picked from commit ef4358e536)
Makes it clear that disabling a module is something that should be
avoided if possible.
Test: m soong_docs
Change-Id: Ief11e705f049edfd53b2af66bdf753f24d32aa71
apex { name: ["myapex"], native_shared_libs: ["libX", "libY"] }
cc_library { name: "libX", shared_libs: ["libY"] }
cc_library { name: "libY", shared_libs: ["libZ"], stubs: {...} }
apexDepsMutator was a bottom up mutator and it uses WalkDeps to traverse
the dependency tree rooted at myapex in a depth-first order. While
traversing the tree, if calls BuildForApex for a module that will be
part of the APEX.
libY is visited twice. Once via libX and once via myapex. If the visit
from libX was before the visit from myapex (since this is a depth-first
traversing), BuildForApex is not called for libY and its dependency
libZ, because libY provides a stub. And then when libY is again visited
via myapex, BuildForApex is correctly called for the module, but not for
its dependencies libZ because the paths from libY to libZ was already
visited.
As a result, the apex variant of libY has a dependency to the non-apex
variant of libZ.
Fixing the problem by changing the mutator a top-down one.
Bug: 148645937
Test: m
Change-Id: Ib2cb28852087c63a568b3fd036504e9261cf0782
libhidlbase is now being built without intermediate static libraries.
This requires a different neverallow exception for the
'enforce_vintf_manifest' variable.
Bug: N/A
Test: N/A
Change-Id: I5b7f7fc8eb4ac37d658e60a491c39baa5ac137f8
This is to unify boot jars with system server jars:
PRODUCT_SYSTEM_SERVER_JARS and PRODUCT_UPDATABLE_SYSTEM_SERVER_JARS
do not overlap.
Test: walleye-userdebug boots
Bug: 146363577
Change-Id: If001049a46f8e9d38921dabeedbd61e971ebfe73
Adds an SdkMemberType implementation for java_system_modules. It
specifies that java_system_modules can be used with sdk as well as
module_exports, and also that the libs property should be included
as transitive members in the sdk.
It also adds support for treating appropriate tagged properties in
the snapshot prebuilts module as references to sdk members so that
they are correctly transformed when creating the versioned modules.
Bug: 142940300
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ic10b5a6d5b92b6018334fe876f06feaf79cc55e9
Allow an sdk member type to treat some of its dependencies as being
members of the sdk.
Needed for the java_system_modules type whose libs property are an
implementation detail of the system module and so should not be
explicitly listed in the sdk module but still have to be included in
the sdk snapshot.
Bug: 142940300
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I90f37dae269ef64a6fe9debd0bbaf29a64dd74d8
Product variables structs are generated at runtime to contain only
the properties that apply to the current module. Defaults modules
always contained all product variable properties. Defaults modules
apply their properties to the target module using
proptools.PrependProperties, which prepends structs that have
matching types. Filtered property structs had a different type
and were dropped.
Even after adding filtering to the defaults product variable
properties, defaults modules may contain more property structs
than the target module they are applied to, so the product
variables struct for the defaults module could contain more
fields than the product variables struct for the target module.
Use proptools.PrependMatchingProperties when applying defaults
of product variables instead, which will apply matching properties
across types.
Test: defaults_test.go
Test: variable_test.go
Change-Id: I281bdefef92053457a3b7b65383493a4e7d999df
The zero value check was being done by using reflect.DeepEqual on a
field from the default product variables, but this results in
comparison against a random type when the product variables struct
for the module has been filtered down. Luckily this will always
fail false, which just removed and optimization but left the
behavior correct.
Use reflect.IsZero instead, which is both faster and correct.
Test: variable_test.go
Change-Id: Ieaaa590c2788ca39230e6695397e8ba8d1c6c103
Soong config variables come from Make where they might be capitalized,
but Blueprint didn't handle capitalized variables well. Add test
coverage for capitalized Soong config variables.
Bug: 148865218
Test: soong_config_module_test.go
Change-Id: I1e434e392d5ee660a221a0d3f959811c35e65865
Add a dependency on the Soong config module definition file in case
it wasn't called Android.bp.
Fixes: 148866376
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: Ib441881bcee52fd1dc3a8d1c5ae4f5f0b7efe3ce
