"dlv attach":
- Spams the terminal
- Requires sysctl -w kernel.yama.ptrace_scope=0
- Apparently, does not allow the debugger to inspect variables
Test: Manual.
Change-Id: I625369effaf5abda2b5d884c8ce5bde7247774eb
Modules in a package is implicitly visible within the same package.
When making effective visibility rules which work from another location
that visibility needs to be mentioned explicitly. In practice this
allows prebuilts to remain visible to other modules in the source
package when the prebuilts are preferred.
Test: m nothing
Test: m conscrypt-module-sdk, check that the snapshot Soong modules give
visibility to //external/conscrypt
Bug: 151303681
Merged-In: I404f6e5ca7021974a8c7be5e4d6b4982c050b8a5
Change-Id: I404f6e5ca7021974a8c7be5e4d6b4982c050b8a5
(cherry picked from commit 0641d189d0)
To reduce clutter a little.
// Added for rvc-dev. Used this bug as it is the bug that needs all the build changes.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I0d2d86f00c3d38e603d6f58c4b1dd9a4170bf819
Change-Id: I0d2d86f00c3d38e603d6f58c4b1dd9a4170bf819
(cherry picked from commit 01407c525a)
Introduce a singleton apex rule to merge contents of individual
deps-info results into a single output file.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m
Change-Id: I4ab7e1a3527fead97a81a5a2cb0e1e93a429117c
Vendor JNI libraries already have stable APIs enforced by the VNDK,
they shouldn't use SDK variants.
Bug: 156225490
Test: TestJNISDK
Change-Id: I21ba67e8e9fb05016caf5888129adc1a939545c2
Merged-In: I21ba67e8e9fb05016caf5888129adc1a939545c2
(cherry picked from commit c2d24050c5)
Modules in a package is implicitly visible within the same package.
When making effective visibility rules which work from another location
that visibility needs to be mentioned explicitly. In practice this
allows prebuilts to remain visible to other modules in the source
package when the prebuilts are preferred.
Test: m nothing
Test: m conscrypt-module-sdk, check that the snapshot Soong modules give
visibility to //external/conscrypt
Bug: 151303681
Change-Id: I404f6e5ca7021974a8c7be5e4d6b4982c050b8a5
For java.AndroidApp app, app.MinSdkVersion() was selected from
ApexBundleDepsInfo, not from java.Module.
This caused app.MinSdkVersion() to return "" always.
Besides, having two embeded fields and relying on depth to choose one of
them makes it hard to read.
Bug: 156537348
Test: m
Change-Id: Ib525b2f5132c596db8e33492d0a565ea23e91d1c
Vendor JNI libraries already have stable APIs enforced by the VNDK,
they shouldn't use SDK variants.
Bug: 156225490
Test: TestJNISDK
Change-Id: I21ba67e8e9fb05016caf5888129adc1a939545c2
Visibility rules can be 'inherited' in one of two ways. Either from
defaults or from a module that called ctx.CreateModule(...).
Previously, in both cases the inheriting module could only append
additional visibility rules to the end of the inherited rules. That
made it impossible to restrict the visibility by removing or ignore
inherited rules.
The //visibility:override rectifies that by allowing the inheriting
module to ignore all the rules that they would have inherited. It can
only go at the beginning of a list of rules specified in a module but
after defaults are applied it can end up in the middle of a list of
rules. In that case it behaves as if all the rules up to and including
the //visibility:override rule were discarded.
It can be used with //visibility:private to override
//visibility:public and vice versa.
Bug: 155787200
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I8a9c9c5a1bdceaee387c08864ae2b34629e0d46f
Change-Id: I8a9c9c5a1bdceaee387c08864ae2b34629e0d46f
(cherry picked from commit 51084ff6cf)
Visibility rules can be 'inherited' in one of two ways. Either from
defaults or from a module that called ctx.CreateModule(...).
Previously, in both cases the inheriting module could only append
additional visibility rules to the end of the inherited rules. That
made it impossible to restrict the visibility by removing or ignore
inherited rules.
The //visibility:override rectifies that by allowing the inheriting
module to ignore all the rules that they would have inherited. It can
only go at the beginning of a list of rules specified in a module but
after defaults are applied it can end up in the middle of a list of
rules. In that case it behaves as if all the rules up to and including
the //visibility:override rule were discarded.
It can be used with //visibility:private to override
//visibility:public and vice versa.
Bug: 155787200
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I8a9c9c5a1bdceaee387c08864ae2b34629e0d46f
Checks the syntax of the Android.bp file generated for the sdk
snapshot. While this will not detect all possible problems with the
generated Android.bp file it will detect some and it is far better to
detect those issues during generation than when it is unpacked and
used.
Bug: 155628860
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ieec86a7a49fa2e3bd8b9f83aca540114232a3476
Adds a filter mechanism that can exclude property values from being
included in the common value extraction. That is needed to prevent the
snapshot mechanism from generating invalid output for properties that
are ignored on host (and have their values cleared) and which are not
tagged with `android:"arch_variant"`.
Changes:
* Updates the documentation of SdkMemberType to explain what effect
the 'ignored-on-host' tag has.
* Adds some tests for this new mechanism.
Bug: 155628860
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ibafdb6e921ba5abe505bd8a91ca5a1d9c9b5d0cb
Change-Id: Ibafdb6e921ba5abe505bd8a91ca5a1d9c9b5d0cb
(cherry picked from commit c459f89fb4)
Previously, the snapshot code did not know whether a specific property
could be arch specific or not and assumed that they all were which
meant that it could generate snapshots containing arch specific values
for properties that are not arch specific and so would fail when
unpacked.
This change requires arch specific fields in SdkMemberProperties to be
tagged as such using `android:"arch_variant"` (just as in module input
property structures). Any property without that must have properties
that are common across all variants.
Bug: 155628860
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I3df60f0b53ba02ec2c55a80c7da058eac5909d26
Change-Id: I3df60f0b53ba02ec2c55a80c7da058eac5909d26
(cherry picked from commit 864e1b45db)
Adds a filter mechanism that can exclude property values from being
included in the common value extraction. That is needed to prevent the
snapshot mechanism from generating invalid output for properties that
are ignored on host (and have their values cleared) and which are not
tagged with `android:"arch_variant"`.
Changes:
* Updates the documentation of SdkMemberType to explain what effect
the 'ignored-on-host' tag has.
* Adds some tests for this new mechanism.
Bug: 155628860
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ibafdb6e921ba5abe505bd8a91ca5a1d9c9b5d0cb
Previously, the snapshot code did not know whether a specific property
could be arch specific or not and assumed that they all were which
meant that it could generate snapshots containing arch specific values
for properties that are not arch specific and so would fail when
unpacked.
This change requires arch specific fields in SdkMemberProperties to be
tagged as such using `android:"arch_variant"` (just as in module input
property structures). Any property without that must have properties
that are common across all variants.
Bug: 155628860
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I3df60f0b53ba02ec2c55a80c7da058eac5909d26
* changes:
Revert "Detect invalid arch specific properties in snapshot"
Revert "Adds support for 'ignored-on-host'"
Revert "Fix snapshot of a host/device cc_library with stubs"
Revert submission 1302576
Bug: 156054601
Reason for revert: Presumed root cause of build break.
Reverted Changes:
Ifc8116e11:Detect invalid arch specific properties in snapsho...
I7ebd33307:Adds support for 'ignored-on-host'
I167b47a13:Fix snapshot of a host/device cc_library with stub...
Change-Id: Id7eba0bdde5c579e10e9b42d94a7cfab5f34995f
