If a java_sdk_library_import has a corresponding java_sdk_library then
make the java_sdk_library_import export both the xml and impl modules
created by the java_sdk_library.
Makes java_sdk_library_import consistent with java_sdk_library by
providing libraries within the same APEX access to the implementation
library instead of the stubs.
Bug: 158304459
Test: m nothing
Test what happens when building com.android.tethering with and without
a preferred "framework-tethering" java_sdk_library_import. Make sure that
it does not change the generated APEX.
Merged-In: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
Change-Id: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
(cherry picked from commit eedc5d55ce)
Use a method to add the properties that are present on all java modules.
Bug: 153485543
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: I7803b15eb0de810c8ab8d4b9acf2511935a26fb6
If a java_sdk_library_import has a corresponding java_sdk_library then
make the java_sdk_library_import export both the xml and impl modules
created by the java_sdk_library.
Makes java_sdk_library_import consistent with java_sdk_library by
providing libraries within the same APEX access to the implementation
library instead of the stubs.
Bug: 158304459
Test: m nothing
Test what happens when building com.android.tethering with and without
a preferred "framework-tethering" java_sdk_library_import. Make sure that
it does not change the generated APEX.
Change-Id: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
Module stubs compile against module_current, so any module depending on
them had to compile against module_current (or broader) too. Treat them
as the API surface the stubs are for.
Bug: 157010342
Test: m
Change-Id: I49b9082dc1b5afe6c22e94126e574dd8061f0f39
Merged-In: I49b9082dc1b5afe6c22e94126e574dd8061f0f39
(cherry picked from commit 0bd88d0b4e)
This is in line with the main android stubs (android.jar). I discovered
the difference since we want to merge some java_sdk_libraries into the
android.jar files, but I believe the rationale for compiling it with
version 8 applies to all stubs (we don't want level 9-language features
because some tooling may be stuck with version 8).
Bug: 144149403
Test: presubmit (checkbuild)
Change-Id: I9439ed516dda68ef516ff08d1c6045de3d3c1c0e
Merged-In: I9439ed516dda68ef516ff08d1c6045de3d3c1c0e
(cherry picked from commit cf4dd4c1df)
Previously, the code copied the current.txt file to both the
current_api and removed_api properties. This change copies the
removed.txt file to the removed_api property instead.
Bug: 157980685
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Iad34e91051da43222d22c240c16f50887c43d73e
Change-Id: Iad34e91051da43222d22c240c16f50887c43d73e
(cherry picked from commit 3dbf9fd892)
Previously, the code copied the current.txt file to both the
current_api and removed_api properties. This change copies the
removed.txt file to the removed_api property instead.
Bug: 157980685
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Iad34e91051da43222d22c240c16f50887c43d73e
Passes the shared_library property through to the snapshot. It does not
optimize away the default value in order to make it easier to invert
the default value in future. The current default value was only chosen
for convenience because most existing usages were already treated as
shared libraries. It would be safer if modules had to opt in to be used
as shared libraries.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I33c7323f2389b44ed49cebe517ae2cce349117f1
Change-Id: I33c7323f2389b44ed49cebe517ae2cce349117f1
(cherry picked from commit d7eb1c2a76)
Previously, when a lib that doesn't have sdk_version property set
depends on a java_sdk_library, the impl library was used for linking.
This might be too permissive because the client lib might be using empty
sdk_version because it needed some private APIs from the platform, but
not from the java_sdk_library. This actually happend for some of the CTS
tests. They don't set sdk_version, but were directly depending on
android.test.[base|runner|mock].stubs libraries. If we switch the
references to the stub libraries into the corresponding java_sdk_library
modules (e.g. aandroid.test.[base|runner|mock]), then we would be
allowing private APIs to the CTS tests, which is not good.
To solve this problem, default_to_stub property is introduced. It when set
to true prevents the impl lib from being used for linking. When a module
that doesn't have sdk_version depends on it, the widest API surface that
the java_sdk_library provides is linked instead.
Bug: 157007292
Test: m
Merged-In: Id2acc3cafb71d1e90d4fdc9c0c70a73983355e0f
Change-Id: Id2acc3cafb71d1e90d4fdc9c0c70a73983355e0f
(cherry picked from commit 932cdfeb06)
Passes the shared_library property through to the snapshot. It does not
optimize away the default value in order to make it easier to invert
the default value in future. The current default value was only chosen
for convenience because most existing usages were already treated as
shared libraries. It would be safer if modules had to opt in to be used
as shared libraries.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I33c7323f2389b44ed49cebe517ae2cce349117f1
Previously, when a lib that doesn't have sdk_version property set
depends on a java_sdk_library, the impl library was used for linking.
This might be too permissive because the client lib might be using empty
sdk_version because it needed some private APIs from the platform, but
not from the java_sdk_library. This actually happend for some of the CTS
tests. They don't set sdk_version, but were directly depending on
android.test.[base|runner|mock].stubs libraries. If we switch the
references to the stub libraries into the corresponding java_sdk_library
modules (e.g. aandroid.test.[base|runner|mock]), then we would be
allowing private APIs to the CTS tests, which is not good.
To solve this problem, default_to_stub property is introduced. It when set
to true prevents the impl lib from being used for linking. When a module
that doesn't have sdk_version depends on it, the widest API surface that
the java_sdk_library provides is linked instead.
Bug: 157007292
Test: m
Change-Id: Id2acc3cafb71d1e90d4fdc9c0c70a73983355e0f
Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference
them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl,
stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars.
Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for
most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them
directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as
that is created the JSL itself.
Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up
the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and
maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is
a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe.
That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX
as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated
together so compatibility is not an issue.
This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the
implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will
allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of
this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use
for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build
from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate
module.
It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more
restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse.
Bug: 156618935
Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test
tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module
Merged-In: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
(cherry picked from commit 5df793011d)
Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference
them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl,
stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars.
Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for
most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them
directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as
that is created the JSL itself.
Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up
the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and
maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is
a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe.
That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX
as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated
together so compatibility is not an issue.
This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the
implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will
allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of
this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use
for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build
from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate
module.
It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more
restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse.
Bug: 156618935
Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test
tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module
Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
Access to the implementation JARs is restricted to avoid code from
depending on implementation details that could change from one release
to the next which could cause compatibility issues. That is not a
problem when referenced from within the APEX that contains the
java_sdk_library.
As references from within the same APEX often need to access
implementation specific details of the java_sdk_library and doing that
from within the same APEX is safe this change all references to a
java_sdk_library made within the same APEX to use the implementation
jars instead of stub jars.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If239059690de61683c2ad2d8a0ce2e47286a3637
(cherry picked from commit 9b879594ed)
The implementation jars are not built if api_only: true. In that case
the jar paths must not be exposed implicitly as they will be nil and
they will just be ignored.
This change ensures that stubs are returned when the implementation
jars are not built.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: Ic495982a5dcb2754916260e7d91d921a5da288ae
(cherry picked from commit daaa332827)
The expression !sdkVersion.specified() is equivalent to the following:
!sdkVersion.valid() || sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate
That means that the else if clause "sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate" will
never be reached so it was removed.
There is also no need to check sdkVersion.valid() as that will already
have been checked, and an error reported, before this code has been
called. Therefore that has been removed.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ib7c544b48dfb53bad3e15f9f73f71bd05cff9b49
Change-Id: Ib7c544b48dfb53bad3e15f9f73f71bd05cff9b49
(cherry picked from commit c91f5d0cc7)
Access to the implementation JARs is restricted to avoid code from
depending on implementation details that could change from one release
to the next which could cause compatibility issues. That is not a
problem when referenced from within the APEX that contains the
java_sdk_library.
As references from within the same APEX often need to access
implementation specific details of the java_sdk_library and doing that
from within the same APEX is safe this change all references to a
java_sdk_library made within the same APEX to use the implementation
jars instead of stub jars.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If239059690de61683c2ad2d8a0ce2e47286a3637
The implementation jars are not built if api_only: true. In that case
the jar paths must not be exposed implicitly as they will be nil and
they will just be ignored.
This change ensures that stubs are returned when the implementation
jars are not built.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: Ic495982a5dcb2754916260e7d91d921a5da288ae
The expression !sdkVersion.specified() is equivalent to the following:
!sdkVersion.valid() || sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate
That means that the else if clause "sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate" will
never be reached so it was removed.
There is also no need to check sdkVersion.valid() as that will already
have been checked, and an error reported, before this code has been
called. Therefore that has been removed.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ib7c544b48dfb53bad3e15f9f73f71bd05cff9b49
Module stubs compile against module_current, so any module depending on
them had to compile against module_current (or broader) too. Treat them
as the API surface the stubs are for.
Bug: 157010342
Test: m
Change-Id: I49b9082dc1b5afe6c22e94126e574dd8061f0f39
Previously, all java_sdk_library instances were assumed to be usable as
shared libraries, i.e. referenced from <uses-library> in Android
manifest. However, that was not true for any instances that specified
api_only: true and will not be true for many of the new Android
modules.
One consequence of this assumption is that use of one of the api_only
instances could (but fortunately does not appear to) have lead to an
invalid library being referenced in an app's manifest which would
prevent the app from loading. That would have been done automatically
by the implicit sdk library tracking and manifest fixing mechanism and
there would have been nothing a developer could have done about it.
Changes:
1) Prevents api_only instances from participating in the automatic
tracking which will prevent them from being added to Android
manifests and breaking apps.
2) Add a new shared_library property that can have the same effect as
api_only while still creating a runtime implementation library.
3) Renamed commonProperties to commonSdkLibraryProperties to
disambiguate it from the ModuleBase.commonProperties field.
4) Extracts requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() to remove duplicate
code accessing the Api_only property.
5) Tests for the api_only and shared_library behaviours.
Test: m nothing - added tests, tests broke, fixed code, tests passed.
Bug: 156723295
(cherry picked from commit dfa131e673)
Change-Id: I06b3444ced00fd7b54068352187684171024c679
The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are
referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that
includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate
<uses-library> entry in their manifest.
Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that:
1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module
itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs
module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it
possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be
available at runtime.
2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library
was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow
java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should
be treated as an Android shared library.
3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances
which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set
api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the
actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change.
Changes:
* Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into
java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides
the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an
SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any
references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to
the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked.
* Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented
SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the
OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the
sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return
nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked.
* Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is
a better place for it to be.
* Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize
the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating
module.
* Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the
java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be
tracked too.
* Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both
java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly.
Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock
being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken
anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest.
m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the
code.
Bug: 156723295
(cherry picked from commit 859fe961b0)
Change-Id: I760a9ac72856e3a07a497ce40db70c7e70106837
The stubs header jar is optimized for use as a dependency for others
to use. It only changes if there is a significant difference in the
externals of the classes, i.e. anything that a library being compiled
against depends upon. So changes to implementations of method or the
addition/removal of private methods, fields will have no impact.
As there is no benefit in returning the implementation of the stubs
jar this change removes it. The implementation is still used when
taking a snapshot as the header jar is an internal build artefact
that is not suitable for long term snapshot.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
(cherry picked from commit 23970f4285)
Change-Id: I8277ec643837514d74cb57ad4f236ceb1f5c6c5b
Previously, in order to access say the public stubs source jar it was
necessary to directly reference the module by name. This change adds
support for accessing them indirectly via tags.
Test: nothing
Bug: 155164730
(cherry picked from commit 46dc45aba9)
Change-Id: Icc21caee5b4b1da6f958470bd7bae8a37933f24b
The scopePaths struct is used by both java_sdk_library and its prebuilt
but was not populated in the same way. This change addresses those
discrepancies in preparation for a follow up change which will allow
access to some of those fields through OutputFileProvider.
Changes:
* Document the scopePaths field and struct.
* Switch those fields that may not be fully populated from Paths to
OptionalPath to make that 100% clear and protect against unchecked
use.
* Switch java_sdk_library_import to use the dependency extraction
mechanism driven by the dependency tag. This should actually have
been part of the change that added that mechanism.
* Only create prebuilt_stubs_sources if sources have been provided.
* Add dependencies from java_sdk_library_import on its stubs source
child modules if sources have been provided. That will ensure the
stubsSrcJar field is updated.
* Updates current/removedApiFilePath if provided for the scope in
java_sdk_library_import.
* Extracts ApiStubsSrcProvider from ApiStubsProvider to allow it to
be implemented by PrebuiltStubsSources so that it can provide access
to the stubs src jar that it creates.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 148080325
Bug: 155164730
(cherry picked from commit 0f8faffdc0)
Change-Id: Ib56ca608d6fc1357d3d89e9c4cfed6ff8da11735
Previously, when using sdk_version: "module_current" any direct
reference to an sdk library would use the public not module-lib stubs.
This change corrects that.
Prior to the addition of the module-lib api scope almost all
java_sdk_library instances supported all the scopes to which a request
for jars could be redirected, i.e. public, system and test. The
exceptions to that are a few special instances that were used with
sdk_version: "none" and so were either caught by the java_sdk_library
special cases or dropped through to public.
The addition of module-lib, plus the flexible control over which scopes
are generated means that is no longer true. It is possible for a
java_sdk_library to be requested for a scope it does not have which
would have resulted in an empty set of paths being returned leading to
confusing compilation errors.
To avoid that this change also adds support for using the inheritance
hierarchy defined by the apiScope.extends field to fall back to the
closest available surface.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 155164730
(cherry picked from commit 803a9565cd)
Change-Id: I89a0abf4033209f9a104285c990096bc0b4a0255
The java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import redirect a request for
header and implementation jars to broadly the same place although the
java_sdk_library does have some special code that is mixed in with the
common code.
This change separates the java_sdk_library special code from the common
code and moves the common code into its own method for use by both
module types. That makes the special behavior clearer and ensures the
common behavior remains consistent in future.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 155164730
(cherry picked from commit b05d4295de)
Change-Id: Id21cc74d2d37c5a75983fdcd7393f6a37f8872c9
This is in line with the main android stubs (android.jar). I discovered
the difference since we want to merge some java_sdk_libraries into the
android.jar files, but I believe the rationale for compiling it with
version 8 applies to all stubs (we don't want level 9-language features
because some tooling may be stuck with version 8).
Bug: 144149403
Test: presubmit (checkbuild)
Change-Id: I9439ed516dda68ef516ff08d1c6045de3d3c1c0e
This turns out retention of Nullable annotations, which is almost
certainly what every user wants. Also add the "stub-annotations" lib to
the stub libs property, to make sure the nullability annotations
resolve properly.
Bug: 157010342
Test: m
Change-Id: I905144add4ef6f85445eedd1ba5169445f6005e0
Previously, all java_sdk_library instances were assumed to be usable as
shared libraries, i.e. referenced from <uses-library> in Android
manifest. However, that was not true for any instances that specified
api_only: true and will not be true for many of the new Android
modules.
One consequence of this assumption is that use of one of the api_only
instances could (but fortunately does not appear to) have lead to an
invalid library being referenced in an app's manifest which would
prevent the app from loading. That would have been done automatically
by the implicit sdk library tracking and manifest fixing mechanism and
there would have been nothing a developer could have done about it.
Changes:
1) Prevents api_only instances from participating in the automatic
tracking which will prevent them from being added to Android
manifests and breaking apps.
2) Add a new shared_library property that can have the same effect as
api_only while still creating a runtime implementation library.
3) Renamed commonProperties to commonSdkLibraryProperties to
disambiguate it from the ModuleBase.commonProperties field.
4) Extracts requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() to remove duplicate
code accessing the Api_only property.
5) Tests for the api_only and shared_library behaviours.
Test: m nothing - added tests, tests broke, fixed code, tests passed.
Bug: 156723295
Change-Id: Iccf509e808d5ff53522188541a4c54d8f9ada93c
The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are
referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that
includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate
<uses-library> entry in their manifest.
Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that:
1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module
itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs
module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it
possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be
available at runtime.
2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library
was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow
java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should
be treated as an Android shared library.
3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances
which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set
api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the
actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change.
Changes:
* Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into
java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides
the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an
SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any
references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to
the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked.
* Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented
SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the
OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the
sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return
nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked.
* Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is
a better place for it to be.
* Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize
the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating
module.
* Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the
java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be
tracked too.
* Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both
java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly.
Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock
being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken
anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest.
m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the
code.
Bug: 156723295
Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
The stubs header jar is optimized for use as a dependency for others
to use. It only changes if there is a significant difference in the
externals of the classes, i.e. anything that a library being compiled
against depends upon. So changes to implementations of method or the
addition/removal of private methods, fields will have no impact.
As there is no benefit in returning the implementation of the stubs
jar this change removes it. The implementation is still used when
taking a snapshot as the header jar is an internal build artefact
that is not suitable for long term snapshot.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If91b4d106683f23788547c537228c58be2867174
Previously, in order to access say the public stubs source jar it was
necessary to directly reference the module by name. This change adds
support for accessing them indirectly via tags.
Test: nothing
Bug: 155164730
Change-Id: Id6d76e56c7b46944b2d2a44a2163fb05a5b03de9
The scopePaths struct is used by both java_sdk_library and its prebuilt
but was not populated in the same way. This change addresses those
discrepancies in preparation for a follow up change which will allow
access to some of those fields through OutputFileProvider.
Changes:
* Document the scopePaths field and struct.
* Switch those fields that may not be fully populated from Paths to
OptionalPath to make that 100% clear and protect against unchecked
use.
* Switch java_sdk_library_import to use the dependency extraction
mechanism driven by the dependency tag. This should actually have
been part of the change that added that mechanism.
* Only create prebuilt_stubs_sources if sources have been provided.
* Add dependencies from java_sdk_library_import on its stubs source
child modules if sources have been provided. That will ensure the
stubsSrcJar field is updated.
* Updates current/removedApiFilePath if provided for the scope in
java_sdk_library_import.
* Extracts ApiStubsSrcProvider from ApiStubsProvider to allow it to
be implemented by PrebuiltStubsSources so that it can provide access
to the stubs src jar that it creates.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 148080325
Bug: 155164730
Change-Id: Ic5bf884b2b1e79841843e7c3b4642796ecd49f5d
Previously, when using sdk_version: "module_current" any direct
reference to an sdk library would use the public not module-lib stubs.
This change corrects that.
Prior to the addition of the module-lib api scope almost all
java_sdk_library instances supported all the scopes to which a request
for jars could be redirected, i.e. public, system and test. The
exceptions to that are a few special instances that were used with
sdk_version: "none" and so were either caught by the java_sdk_library
special cases or dropped through to public.
The addition of module-lib, plus the flexible control over which scopes
are generated means that is no longer true. It is possible for a
java_sdk_library to be requested for a scope it does not have which
would have resulted in an empty set of paths being returned leading to
confusing compilation errors.
To avoid that this change also adds support for using the inheritance
hierarchy defined by the apiScope.extends field to fall back to the
closest available surface.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 155164730
Change-Id: I6aab75a772433ee0a36b6f1758a4aec4be2f9a49
The java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import redirect a request for
header and implementation jars to broadly the same place although the
java_sdk_library does have some special code that is mixed in with the
common code.
This change separates the java_sdk_library special code from the common
code and moves the common code into its own method for use by both
module types. That makes the special behavior clearer and ensures the
common behavior remains consistent in future.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 155164730
Change-Id: I53e41a18792488aefd6a886c587559e90b3c4fde
Fields in embedded structures can be accessed without qualifying them
by the type of the embedded structure.
This reduces the size of follow up changes that switch java_sdk_library
from embedding Library.
Bug: 156618935
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I84f294c6f02d5089055130c63f5fb0538a1f21b9
Change-Id: I84f294c6f02d5089055130c63f5fb0538a1f21b9
(cherry picked from commit a18abc2a61)
Fields in embedded structures can be accessed without qualifying them
by the type of the embedded structure.
This reduces the size of follow up changes that switch java_sdk_library
from embedding Library.
Bug: 156618935
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I84f294c6f02d5089055130c63f5fb0538a1f21b9
