prebuilt doesn't define.
Test: m
Test: "m" on a platform tree with prebuilts/runtime in the manifest
Bug: 151303681
Change-Id: I8e10579c5daa79e82009a0c3060cde76cdf520e9
Previously, when a lib that doesn't have sdk_version property set
depends on a java_sdk_library, the impl library was used for linking.
This might be too permissive because the client lib might be using empty
sdk_version because it needed some private APIs from the platform, but
not from the java_sdk_library. This actually happend for some of the CTS
tests. They don't set sdk_version, but were directly depending on
android.test.[base|runner|mock].stubs libraries. If we switch the
references to the stub libraries into the corresponding java_sdk_library
modules (e.g. aandroid.test.[base|runner|mock]), then we would be
allowing private APIs to the CTS tests, which is not good.
To solve this problem, default_to_stub property is introduced. It when set
to true prevents the impl lib from being used for linking. When a module
that doesn't have sdk_version depends on it, the widest API surface that
the java_sdk_library provides is linked instead.
Bug: 157007292
Test: m
Change-Id: Id2acc3cafb71d1e90d4fdc9c0c70a73983355e0f
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I2b792657b444f0c963e1e92b7c91f6a0cfe1688c
(cherry picked from commit be6e2b6a18)
Change-Id: I2b792657b444f0c963e1e92b7c91f6a0cfe1688c
Changing of installable function has broken vendor snapshot's header
libraries. Fixing it and adding tests to prevent further breakage.
Bug: 157106227
Test: m vendor-snapshot captures header libraries
Change-Id: I8b581c1b2186ca2db85ae408e959c20bbd034db6
Previously, if a data source was included in multiple APEX, it would
appear multiple times; however, this caused errors for overriding
commands for targets
Test: apex_test.go
Test: m nothing with change I54d92eca88fc04c949209d490e838d0a92ce8f87
Bug: 155820504
Change-Id: I98f04e0fd9fa3238f2bb0e5da3a86fc0797c38ba
For an end user hitting these errors, the most likely reason is that
they have mixed up linker and crtbegin_dynamic.o from different builds
in their out tree.
Test: Build a linux_bionic executable in a tree exhibiting b/157549171.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 157549171
Change-Id: I64bee0848ed61226da6654caf3bafb51cf46d923
Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference
them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl,
stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars.
Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for
most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them
directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as
that is created the JSL itself.
Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up
the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and
maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is
a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe.
That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX
as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated
together so compatibility is not an issue.
This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the
implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will
allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of
this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use
for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build
from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate
module.
It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more
restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse.
Bug: 156618935
Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test
tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module
Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
Filenames specified in the "symlinks" property are passed to
LOCAL_MODULE_SYMLINKS, and kati would install these symlinks.
For example:
```
prebuilt_etc {
name: "foo",
symlinks: [
"bar",
"baz",
],
}
```
Installs these files on device:
- system/etc/foo
- system/etc/bar -> foo
- system/etc/baz -> foo
Bug: 157537895
Test: Add some symlinks to a prebuilt_etc module and check artifact
Change-Id: If50844e8a212a966be931117cfdff5bf73aadf25
Drop down to a single high-mem task when we've got <=16GB, as the system
probably isn't completely free RAM, ninja will be using a couple gigs,
along with whatever "normal" actions will be running concurrently. So
it's unlikely that we can handle two 6-8GB actions along with everything
else.
Also print warnings when we detect <=16GB total RAM, or when we're
running more parallel jobs than than we have GB RAM. These both notify
the user and suggest lowering the `-j` value if they run into problems.
Test: fake totalRAM to [0.5,8,16]GB, checking warning
Test: fake totalRAM to 17GB, `m -j4 nothing` has no warning
Test: `m -j187 nothing` on a 188GB system
Test: `m -j188 nothing` on a 188GB system
Change-Id: Ieb008e9f462d5f40fb65781d94cf116b1caf8446
I made a mistake and only fixed android_test_import in my previous
change, I5bbb2d2b733bbd6b868898285683ba5ff45be10b.
Bug: 154281342
Test: TreeHugger
Test: chromium-webview
Change-Id: I1575d9ef3f8596f1eb8db0867db09de08945d711
Previously, droiddoc was using SdkImplementationJars() to get a JAR to
add to the classpath in order to resolve unknown references in the
source.
Given that SdkHeaderJars() returns jars created by Turbine which are
(for compilation at least) functionally identical to the implementation
jars there is no point in using the implementation jars.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I2b718cc1445c04e849dcb0b1f53bba2b0bd90c95
Access to the implementation JARs is restricted to avoid code from
depending on implementation details that could change from one release
to the next which could cause compatibility issues. That is not a
problem when referenced from within the APEX that contains the
java_sdk_library.
As references from within the same APEX often need to access
implementation specific details of the java_sdk_library and doing that
from within the same APEX is safe this change all references to a
java_sdk_library made within the same APEX to use the implementation
jars instead of stub jars.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If239059690de61683c2ad2d8a0ce2e47286a3637
The implementation jars are not built if api_only: true. In that case
the jar paths must not be exposed implicitly as they will be nil and
they will just be ignored.
This change ensures that stubs are returned when the implementation
jars are not built.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: Ic495982a5dcb2754916260e7d91d921a5da288ae
