Revert submission 1714835-roboleaf-asm-c
Reason for revert: TestCcLibraryStaticProductVariableSelects fails everywhere
Reverted Changes:
I28cf7437e:Split asm and c flags and srcs in bp2build output
I2b47e6b55:Split libraries by language in cc_library_static
Change-Id: I85d39a462f0a5b3f5ff3d685906813fab9f01358
llndk.libraries.txt is used to list the LLNDKs for the linkerconfig.
This is also required to define the VNDK snapshot modules of LLNDK
stub libraries.
The list had a filter for hwasan libraries, but the filter must be
used only for the LLNDK_LIBRARIES make variable, but not for the
llndk.libraries.txt file.
Bug: 189070366
Bug: 188716508
Test: m nothing
Test: LLNDK_LIBRARIES in make_vars-*.mk does not include hwasan.
Change-Id: I820dd1161892dc76700aa1d696ea2643764d2052
Merged-In: I820dd1161892dc76700aa1d696ea2643764d2052
(cherry picked from commit 611e886ca7)
This allows removal of almost all current items from the mixed build
denylist, which were previously broken due to being unable to separately
control flags for compilations of different languages within the same
target.
Note that this does not appropriately implement asm/c srcs and flags for
either the shared variant or the static variant. This will require a
followup.
Test: bp2build.sh and mixed_libc.sh CI scripts
Test: Updated b2build tests
Change-Id: I28cf7437ee96cdf2fdbcb1eda2303691cff08ba4
llndk.libraries.txt is used to list the LLNDKs for the linkerconfig.
This is also required to define the VNDK snapshot modules of LLNDK
stub libraries.
The list had a filter for hwasan libraries, but the filter must be
used only for the LLNDK_LIBRARIES make variable, but not for the
llndk.libraries.txt file.
Bug: 189070366
Bug: 188716508
Test: m nothing
Test: LLNDK_LIBRARIES in make_vars-*.mk does not include hwasan.
Change-Id: I820dd1161892dc76700aa1d696ea2643764d2052
Bug: http://b/186576313
During a coverage build, pass the __ANDROID_CLANG_COVERAGE__ macro to
native compilations. This allows tools like dalvikvm and dex2oat, which
would otherwise call _exit(), to write profiles on coverage builds by
calling exit() instead.
Test: `m CLANG_COVERAGE=true NATIVE_COVERAGE_PATHS="art" nothing`
and check compiler flags in out/soong/build.ninja.
Change-Id: I18315b89170abdd650e4c6c55577688348c42225
(cherry picked from commit 551b06d9e6)
It's possible that a module will have a product variant
but not a core variant. In that case, we still need to
apply the vendor suffix to the androidmk module name.
Bug: 188720375
Bug: 187963715
Test: Build vendor image using vendor snapshot.
Change-Id: I190fdd707ca23357d1c324c1b1f3318457625f03
Merged-In: I190fdd707ca23357d1c324c1b1f3318457625f03
(cherry picked from commit 4016d7b53e)
VNDK snapshots newer than v30 have LLNDK stub libraries. In that
case, the vendor variant for the BOARD_VNDK_VERSION must not be
generated from the LLNDK modules. They are already provided by the
VNDK snapshots.
Generate the vendor variant of the BOARD_VNDK_VERSION only if
BOARD_VNDK_VERSION has an integer value less than or equal to 30.
Bug: 187963715
Bug: 181815415
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I31e90f4d7e7678c45558f6bf987f5582a4c34f78
Merged-In: I31e90f4d7e7678c45558f6bf987f5582a4c34f78
(cherry picked from commit dee806fd09)
It's possible that a module will have a product variant
but not a core variant. In that case, we still need to
apply the vendor suffix to the androidmk module name.
Bug: 188720375
Bug: 187963715
Test: Build vendor image using vendor snapshot.
Change-Id: I190fdd707ca23357d1c324c1b1f3318457625f03
.. in preparation for the upcoming change. This change doesn't alter any
behavior.
InApexes is a misleading name. People expects that it has the list of
soong module names of the APEXes that a module is part of. So, for
example, `core-oj` is a part of both `com.android.art` and
`com.google.android.art`. However, in reality, that's not true. The
field has `com.android.art` only. This is because the two APEXes
(android and Google) have the same apex name which is `com.android.art`.
That apex name is used in various places like the `apex_available` and
allows us to keep using the same name regardless of whether the APEX is
overridden or not.
However, this is causing problems in some cases where the exact list of
soong module names is required. The upcoming change will add a new field
to handle the case and the new field actually will get the name
'InApexes'. So, the existing field is renamed to a less misleading name
`InApexVariants`.
Cherry-picked from https://r.android.com/1710528.
Bug: 180325915
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I0c73361b452eddb812acd5ebef5dcedaab382436
Merged-In: I0c73361b452eddb812acd5ebef5dcedaab382436
Test: bp2build and mixed_libc CI
Test: Manually verified that libc_bionic_ndk compilation gets the
appropriate headers (and no extra headers) from downstream
Change-Id: I79eb6e8ec1d415bd50d12105da4cf97101f95474
VNDK snapshots newer than v30 have LLNDK stub libraries. In that
case, the vendor variant for the BOARD_VNDK_VERSION must not be
generated from the LLNDK modules. They are already provided by the
VNDK snapshots.
Generate the vendor variant of the BOARD_VNDK_VERSION only if
BOARD_VNDK_VERSION has an integer value less than or equal to 30.
Bug: 187963715
Bug: 181815415
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I31e90f4d7e7678c45558f6bf987f5582a4c34f78
At least until libc and libm builds, which are the common values in
system_shared_libs. We don't have a way to break the cycle of:
libstdc++.so (system_shared_libs) -> libc.so -> ...(whole_static_libs) -> libstdc++.a (system_shared_libs) -> []
because bp2build just sees it as:
libstdc++ (system_shared_libs) -> libc -> (whole_static_libs) -> libstdc++ (system_shared_libs) -> libc -> ...
therefore creating a cycle.
This CL punts the problem for now by ignoring system_shared_libs in the cc deps mutator, with a TODO.
Test: TH
Bug: b/186024507
Bug: b/186489250
Change-Id: Id4744593af39b7eb3b31418c8afaeeac99a0ab5f
Propagating enabling ASAN through shared library dependencies
doesn't make much sense, because only the non-ASAN variant is exposed
to Make, leading to an non-installed dependency.
Bug: 186487510
Test: TestAsan
Change-Id: I7d3f20f2d10beac09c66c6b6dcb7a34a513ff3b8
Merged-In: I7d3f20f2d10beac09c66c6b6dcb7a34a513ff3b8
(cherry picked from commit af98f58242)
.. in preparation for the upcoming change. This change doesn't alter any
behavior.
InApexes is a misleading name. People expects that it has the list of
soong module names of the APEXes that a module is part of. So, for
example, `core-oj` is a part of both `com.android.art` and
`com.google.android.art`. However, in reality, that's not true. The
field has `com.android.art` only. This is because the two APEXes
(android and Google) have the same apex name which is `com.android.art`.
That apex name is used in various places like the `apex_available` and
allows us to keep using the same name regardless of whether the APEX is
overridden or not.
However, this is causing problems in some cases where the exact list of
soong module names is required. The upcoming change will add a new field
to handle the case and the new field actually will get the name
'InApexes'. So, the existing field is renamed to a less misleading name
`InApexVariants`.
Bug: 180325915
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I0c73361b452eddb812acd5ebef5dcedaab382436
