Change https://r.android.com/1335521 added tag property to the Dist
struct so that it could be used to select one of a number of different
output files to copy to the dist instead of the single file that the
module type made available for dist. The output files were selected
by passing the tag to OutputFiles(tag).
Module types that wanted to support this new approach had to explicitly
set AndroidMkEntries.DistFiles = GenerateTaggedDistFiles(module).
Unfortunately, doing that had a side effect of changing the behavior of
dist entries without a tag.
That was because the change treated a tag that was not specified, as
being the same as "". So, prior to the change no tag meant use the
default dist file but after it meant use the paths returned by
OutputFiles(""). That changed the behavior of the java.Library type
which affected the behavior of the android_app module type.
Prior to the change the java_library would make the
Library.outputFile available for dist when no tag was specified. After
that change it would make Library.outputFile plus
Library.extraOutputFiles. The latter is usually empty except for
android_app which adds some extra files into there which will now be
copied to the dist. That change may have been intentional but there
was no mention of it in the change or the bug. Even if it wasn't
intentional it may still be beneficial.
Any module type that wants to add support for tags in dist runs the
risk of introducing similar changes in behavior. This change
differentiates between the tag not being set and the tag being set to
"" to avoid that possibility and to make the default behavior
explicit for those module types that have switched.
It does so as follows:
* Adds a DefaultDistTag constant that is used when the tag is not set.
It is a string that is unlikely to be used as an actual tag as it
does not start with a . and uses some special characters.
* The DefaultDistTag is used in MakeDefaultDistFiles(paths) to indicate
that the supplied paths are the default ones and and also in
GenerateTaggedDistFiles() for Dist structures that have no tag
property set.
* The DefaultDistTag is passed to OutputFiles(tag) just in case the
module type has explicitly defined the paths to associate with that
tag in there. If it has then it overrides the legacy behavior. If it
has not then it is just ignored and falls back to using the previous
behavior.
* The java.Library.OutputFiles(tag) method explicitly handles the
DefaultDistTag and returns Library.outputFile for it which restores
the behavior from before the change that added dist.tag support.
* Similar change was made to apexBundle.OutputFiles(tag) in order to
preserve its previous behaviour.
* The customModule used by TestGetDistContributions has been modified
to also preserve its previous behavior after this change.
Test: m nothing
m dist sdk - before and after this change, compare result to
make sure that there are no significant differences.
Test the effect on the apex by following instructions in
http://b/172951145
Bug: 174226317
Change-Id: Ib8f0d9307751cc2ed34e3d9a5538d3c144666f6d
Mostly documentation changes, but includes a few refactorings like
changing the variable names, reordering functions, reordering statements
in logical order, etc.
Bug: 173472337
Test: m
Change-Id: Iefdc8e463bcda60187b98e8c90661e220e8cdf40
Mostly documentation changes, but includes a few refactorings like
changing the variable names, reording functions, reordering statements
in logical order, etc.
Bug: 173472337
Test: m
Change-Id: Ie1799c0972d63da823ad375f008018de782529d1
Mostly documentation changes, but includes a few refactorings like
changing the variable names, reording functions, reordering statements
in logical order, etc.
Bug: 173472337
Test: m
Change-Id: I000c76e818722ed06bac03d9de87588b23552b08
The source code is reorganized following the order of the execution for
better readability. The order is as follows:
1) init
2) properties
3) module struct
4) deps mutator
5) post-deps mutator
6) generate build actions
7) module initialization for different sub types
8) misc (e.g. apex_available check, etc.)
Behavior is not touched.
Bug: 173472337
Test: m
Merged-In: I919fca468fa376273d498029e6ac2fa37998a4a6
Change-Id: I919fca468fa376273d498029e6ac2fa37998a4a6
which was added to support built-time common apex. But the common apex
was abandoned and it is used nowhere.
This is a manual revert of 5c998b9ff8.
Bug: 173329465
Test: m
Change-Id: I684e6b8bfe2ef5b53943329f4aaa5a5ccba27738
This error tracks `apex_available` closure, but the message doesn't
indicate this variable specifically. Calling it out to try to make
the problem more searchable/discoverable/intuitable.
Bug: N/A
Test: apex_test.go
Change-Id: Ib254ace1dbd4e77d073ed4f98ee181dd86adfcfc
Prepare for making the relationship between an llndk_library stubs
module and the cc_library implementation module explicit by
adding an llndk_stubs property. Each cc_library will be updated
to point to its llndk_library, and the llndk_library name will
be changed to make the .llndk suffix explicit. Then the implicit
connection and suffix can be removed.
Bug: 170784825
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: I6b0482a3f286ec29b2e928551aa4317749f2b499
A global variant was used to store the global mapping between
modules and APEXes. Replace it with storing pointers to APEX
contents inside each module so that they can query the contents
of any APEXes they belong to.
Bug: 146393795
Test: all Soong tests
Test: single line change to build.ninja host install dependency ordering
Test: no Android-${TARGET_PRODUCT}.mk, make_vars-${TARGET_PRODUCT}.mk or late-${TARGET_PRODUCT}.mk
Change-Id: Id2d7b73ea27f8c3b41d30820bdd86b65c539bfa4
When building an APEX, the build system included artifacts from all
targets that are returned from ctx.MultiTargets(). This however has
became a problem as we add new host targets like linux_bionic_arm64.
When there are multiple host targets having different OSes,
ctx.MultiTargets() returns one target per a host OS. For example, when
linux_bionic_arm64 is enabled, ctx.MultiTargets() returns the following
two targets because linux_bionic != linux_glibc.
* linux_glibc_86_64
* linux_bionic_arm64
Some dependencies (like soong_zip, etc.) are not enabled for the new
host target (because they don't have to) and therefore the build fails.
Since the purpose of host APEX is to package some host tools for
testing, etc., we actually don't need the second target for APEX.
Fixing the problem by not skipping "cross host" targets which can't be
natively executed on the host machine.
Bug: 169454252
Test: HOST_CROSS_OS=linux_bionic HOST_CROSS_ARCH=arm64 m
Test: DIST_DIR=$(pwd)/out/dist \
./art/tools/dist_linux_bionic.sh com.android.support.apexer
Change-Id: Idaded56e4b4fc0195c8bbc760e4b4728016bd5b4
Flattened APEXes are installed in /<partition>/apex/<name>, so its
file_contexts file should be amended accordingly.
For example, file_contexts of an apex "com.android.foo" with should be
modified by prepending actual install path to the path regex.
/bin/foo <sepolicy label>
=> /system/apex/com\.android\.foo/bin/foo <sepolicy label>
File_contexts file is emitted to "make" via LOCAL_FILE_CONTEXTS variable
for apex_manifest.pb module.
Make collects these files and use them to build file_contexts.bin.
Also removed global state which is used to keep the list of all
flattened apexes.
Bug: 166518492
Test: m file_contexts.bin
check intermediate file_contexts.modules.tmp file
in $OUT/obj/ETC/file_contexts.bin_intermediates/
Change-Id: I780370b6e576964a5c09f9477f3361f341dd576b
Keeping the int constant around for now as FutureApiLevelInt because
it's still useful in places that haven't adopted ApiLevel yet for
testing if their non-ApiLevel API level is current or not.
Test: treehugger
Bug: http://b/154667674
Change-Id: I47a7012703f41fdeb56f91edf9c83afa93042deb
AddFarVariationDependencies was broken, which allowed apex to add
dependencies on tests by requesting an empty test_per_src variation
even though some test dependencies did not have a test_per_src
variation. Add an alias from the pre-test_per_src variation
variant to the empty test_per_src variation, and drop the
test_per_src variation when requesting the depencency.
Test: TestApexWithTests
Change-Id: I2ed7bdd761027956141e25d4d81f9074afe628b6
This change fixes a bug that notice files for some module type (e.g.
prebuilt_etc) were not included in APEX. This happened because we relied
on WalkPayloadDeps which actually doesn't traverse module types that
don't implement ApexModule interface. prebuilt_etc is one such module
type. Fixing the problem by also iterating the filesInfo array which
has info about all modules that are included in the APEX.
Bug: 166575301
Test: m com.android.tzdata and inspect the built artifact.
NOTICE.html.gz is there.
Change-Id: Iceb055b60184aef2a3e65e44680304853eb79a53
bpf program is put to an APEX via 'bpfs' property. It is
placed under etc/bpf directory in it.
Fix: 167530625
Test: m
Change-Id: Ia36b486f0cffb619ecc4f7a318cde881abc5baf4
prebuilt_firmware module is one of many prebuilt_etc-like modules. When
it is soc-specific, it is installed in /vendor/firmware. Similarly, when
prebuilt_firmware is embeded in a vendor apex, installing it in
<apex>/firmware instead of <apex>/etc.
Bug: 162701747
Test: lunch sunfish-userdebug
m && device boots && vibrator works
Change-Id: I00d28cde42259aaf8221e3897df77efc42b0c1ca
The affected modules weren't actually built in the affected build,
delay the platform availability check in Make instead to allow
the build to proceed.
Bug: 154888298
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: I21778e38e04635545b352dee2043a33ec9da246b
Add the new property payload_fs_type in apex module type. Either 'f2fs'
or 'ext4'. Default 'ext4'.
Test: m
Bug: 158453869
Change-Id: I36f373251bd597e11acb62af75437a87e2a531ec
Merged-In: I36f373251bd597e11acb62af75437a87e2a531ec
AddFarVariationDependencies was broken, which allowed sdk modules to
request dependencies using image and version variations, even for
host modules that do not have image or version variations. Make
the image and version variations conditional on device sdk modules.
Test: go test ./sdk
Change-Id: I59b7a32a3782254fd5feb828a5258ee13d4db812
APEX variants that share the same SDK version and updatability
almost always use identical command line arguments to build but
with different intermediates directories. This causes unnecessary
build time and disk space for duplicated work.
Deduplicate APEX variants that would build identically. Create
aliases from the per-APEX variations to the new shared variations
so that the APEX modules can continue to depend on them via the
APEX name as the variation.
This has one significant change in behavior. Before this change,
if an APEX had two libraries in its direct dependencies and one
of those libraries depended on the other, and the second library
had stubs, then the first library would depend on the implementation
of the second library and not the stubs. After this change, if
the first library is also present in a second APEX but the second
library is not, then the common variant shared between the two
APEXes would use the stubs, not the implementation.
In a correctly configured set of build rules this change will
be irrelevant, because if the compilation worked for the second
APEX using stubs then it will work for the common variant using
stubs. However, if an incorrect change to the build rules is
made this could lead to confusing errors, as a previously-working
common variant could suddenly stop building when a module is added
to a new APEX without its dependencies that require implementation
APIs to compile.
This change reduces the number of modules in an AOSP arm64-userdebug
build by 3% (52242 to 50586), reduces the number of variants of the
libcutils module from 74 to 53, and reduces the number of variants
of the massive libart[d] modules from 44 to 32.
This relands I0529837476a253c32b3dfb98dcccf107427c742c with a fix
to always mark permissions XML files of java_sdk_library modules as
unique per apex since they contain the APEX filename, and a fix
to UpdateUniqueApexVariationsForDeps to check ApexInfo.InApexes
instead of DepIsInSameApex to check if two modules are in the same
apex to account for a module that depends on another in a way that
doesn't normally include the dependency in the APEX (e.g. a libs
property), but the dependency is directly included in the APEX.
Bug: 164216768
Test: go test ./build/soong/apex/...
Change-Id: I2ae170601f764e5b88d0be2e0e6adc84e3a4d9cc
APEX variants that share the same SDK version and updatability
almost always use identical command line arguments to build but
with different intermediates directories. This causes unnecessary
build time and disk space for duplicated work.
Deduplicate APEX variants that would build identically. Create
aliases from the per-APEX variations to the new shared variations
so that the APEX modules can continue to depend on them via the
APEX name as the variation.
This has one significant change in behavior. Before this change,
if an APEX had two libraries in its direct dependencies and one
of those libraries depended on the other, and the second library
had stubs, then the first library would depend on the implementation
of the second library and not the stubs. After this change, if
the first library is also present in a second APEX but the second
library is not, then the common variant shared between the two
APEXes would use the stubs, not the implementation.
In a correctly configured set of build rules this change will
be irrelevant, because if the compilation worked for the second
APEX using stubs then it will work for the common variant using
stubs. However, if an incorrect change to the build rules is
made this could lead to confusing errors, as a previously-working
common variant could suddenly stop building when a module is added
to a new APEX without its dependencies that require implementation
APIs to compile.
This change reduces the number of modules in an AOSP arm64-userdebug
build by 3% (52242 to 50586), reduces the number of variants of the
libcutils module from 74 to 53, and reduces the number of variants
of the massive libart[d] modules from 44 to 32.
Bug: 164216768
Test: go test ./build/soong/apex/...
Change-Id: I0529837476a253c32b3dfb98dcccf107427c742c
In preparation for reusing the same variation for multiple apexes,
rename ApexName to ApexVariationName.
Bug: 164216768
Test: all soong tests
Change-Id: I88f2c5b192ffa27acd38e01952d0cefd413222a0
Remove ipmemorystore-aidl-interfaces-java in allowlist for
com.android.tethering
Bug: 146436251
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I8b7f97d59c2fd191f467ad50a8fd66d9a5d37704
When a vendor APEX sets use_vndk_as_stable: true, then the apex doesn't
bundle VNDK libraries but instead it uses them from the "vndk" namespace
at runtime.
":vndk" is a pseudo-name for VNDK libraries, which is processed by
linkerconfig so that the generated linker configuration allows the
namespace for the apex to access VNDK libs.
Bug: 159576928
Test: test with a test-only vendor apex
it runs okay with VNDK libs. (lsof shows that it opens libs from
VNDK APEX)
Change-Id: I924ce0fea696162575f59589b8f858deddf436b3
Vendor APEXes(in general, APEXes for non-system partitions) which is
supposed to be tied to a specific VNDK version can set this new property
so that it excludes VNDK libs and use them from VNDK APEX (provided by
system parition).
For these APEXes to use VNDK libs from VNDK APEX, linkerconfig should
link "vndk" linker namespace to the namespaces of these APEXes.
Bug: 159195575
Test: m (soong test added)
Change-Id: If90650973239ef7aab0ff084488bda57d9b0364e
This change fixes this error:
```
TARGET module com.android.adbd.flattened requires non-existent TARGET
module: prebuilt_libclang_rt.ubsan_standalone-arm-android
```
apexFile.moduleName is used as Make dependency name, so it should use
m.BaseModuleName() instead of m.Name(), because soong may prepend
"prebuilt_" to or mutate the output of m.Name() in other ways.
android/androidmk.go emits Android.mk modules with
`LOCAL_MODULE := module.BaseModuleName() + <SubName>`, so replace
apexFile.moduleName with BaseModuleName() + <SubName> as much as
possible.
Bug: 7456955
Test: Add unit test in apex/apex_test.go
Test: lunch blueline_hwasan && SANITIZE_TARGET='hwaddress fuzzer' m nothing
Test: Verify out/soong/Android-blueline_hwasan.mk
Change-Id: If8537fc1bedbe6c3405de3662a5df210a073c43f
Previously, an APEX variant was created for a module that was a member
of an SDK just in case it had to be replaced with an APEX requested
snapshotted version of that member. That was necessary because that was
the only way to have APEX specific replacements.
Since then a new method called ReplaceDependenciesIf() has been added
which provides fine grained control over which dependencies are
replaced. This change uses that new method to handle the replacements
which allows the APEX variants to be removed.
Bug: 161928524
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: If3869dd6753dc182b099af566b20fbc9c9c6eff7
