* changes:
Revert "Create two sentinel api levels"
Revert "Create EffectiveVersion* functions for ApiLevel"
Revert "Prework for migrating min_sdk_version from (kind+level) ..."
Revert "Always include host variants in the sdk snapshot"
Revert "Update min_sdk_version from SdkSpec to ApiLevel"
min_sdk_version signifies device version and does not need an sdkKind to
describe it fully. Update the type and cleanup existing usages. As a
side benefit, we also get better error handling since users can no
longer enter something like `public_30` as a valid min_sdk_version in bp
files
Will do a similar cleanup for targetSdkVersion and maxSdkVersion in a
followup CL
Test: m nothing
Test: no change in ninja files (this should be a no-op)
Bug: 208456999
Change-Id: Ie6ae7e267d093c5e4787e82685daaca1021d202e
Vendor APEXes can be updatable unless it sets "use_vndk_as_stable:true".
When "updatable:true", it should meet the "updatable" requirements like
"should set min_sdk_version".
Bug: 274396342
Bug: 274041915
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Change-Id: I746d8941c21e883c1eba3e1f1e5a414a67db071a
This CL adds a few things:
1) Populate the filesInfo struct with cquery'd information from an
apex's ApexMkInfo provider. This filesInfo is then used in
apex/androidmk.go to generate Make modules (soong_cc_rust_prebuilt.mk),
which are then used in packaging to generate zip files of symbols in $PRODUCT_OUT.
2) Make a list of dicts of primitives JSON-encodable.
3) Tests.
Bug: 271423316
Bug: 271423062
Test: presubmits
Change-Id: Iaa34f51044de310510e580d9cf1fe60bbef801c1
When evaluating whether to build the VNDK for the multi-target
configurations, we construct the API level based on the VNDK
version. When the VNDK version is 'current', we replace the
version name with the platform SDK version e.g. 'UpsideDownCake'.
For architectures that currently have a MinApiArch of FutureApiLevel
(i.e. 'current'), comparing 'UpsideDownCake' with 'current' will
assume 'current' is at a higher API level and skip building the
VNDK.
Before perofrming the API level comparison, we check that the VNDK
version does not match the platform VNDK version. If true, it is
necessary to disable the VNDK when it does not meet the minimum API
level for the architecture. If false, we skip this check and allow
the VNDK to be enabled, as this implies we are targeting the 'current'
VNDK version and should include the target platform VNDK.
Test: m (soong test) & boot
Change-Id: Iacc33d2858fef670ddfdff5bbde9d32b084979c9
override_apex's bp2build converter had a bug where it was looking at
the product variables for the override_apex module itself instead of
for the base module it is overriding.
Fixes: 271424349
Test: go test
Change-Id: If1e2653d3751fa908faf0ab97dfa2e943ebe98ec
Provide a list of the installable apexes in the tree, so that the
multi-tree orchestrator can generate rules for packaging.
Bug: b/266729952
Test: unit tests pass
Change-Id: If2b2585a7d14aed0618ddbacd116bc5728109d87
strict_updatability_linting currently only makes it so
that NewApi can't be added to the lint baseline.
However, since we're updating NewApi to work on a lot
more apis than before, we need to baseline many issues
across the android tree. Temporarily disable
strict_updatability_linting so that we can add these
baselines.
Bug: 193460475
Test: Presubmits
Change-Id: I8d92df95a46e9b903f0cc0e3be56f17722c50430
When set true, use file_contexts file as is and do not force-label / and
/apex_manifest.pb
Bug: 268439003
Test: m (soong tests)
Change-Id: I252eef9569deeac87bb71a3425a8eb07bab3c634
The type of min_sdk_version is being migrated from
android.SdkSpec(kind+level) to android.ApiLevel(level). This affects
`ShouldSupportSdkVersion` for java modules. This function skips the
check for modules compiling against `core`, and that requires access to
SdkVersion and not MinSdkVersion after the migration.
Skip the check explicitly using SdkVersion.
Test: go test ./java
Test: No change in ninja file
Bug: 208456999
Change-Id: I14eca4f8e8c5d7477ded00c4fe54097323fab4a2
Implement APEX stub of API surface so any stub can be replaced with API
surface when APEX stub interface is required.
Unlike other stub interface, APEX stub can be decided if it should be
used after APEX postdeps mutator analyzes which modules should be
included in which APEX. To cover this, APEX stub is being added to the
dependency if the dependency should not be covered with LLNDK or NDK
stub, and APEX stub exists. From depsToPaths, if dependency to both
original module and API library exists, then it choose one of the
dependency and ignore the other.
To cover this logic, a new property is added to the api_surface :
apex_libs. This is introduced as it is difficult to
gather all api library with apex stub before DepsMutator.
Bug: 264963986
Test: cf_x86_64_phone_vendor build succeeded
Change-Id: I9f0b1f70968e32eba94d3e0d7bb1f4bb29ff2438
There are no current users of overriding rros, so it's dead code.
Additionally, there is some evidence of accidental misuse, so remove it
for now as we don't want arbitrary properties of AOSP modules to be
overridable in the general case.
Bug: 270542561
Bug: 269568074
Test: presubmit
Change-Id: I030abd644358baefc0d1543649c8a2a81a7491d0
This reverts commit be90172f0a.
Reason for revert: not used, and not desired
Bug: 270542561
Test: presubmit
Change-Id: I415440dbae965f3c07c6f3ccf6ab4bc9ec57fbf6
This reverts commit dd2c76e772.
Reason for revert: This was submitted without build system team +2 with no rationale for why it's needed.
Change-Id: I86b9849122ec2b7a382d4f39bbbc0ea1ff70c4bc
This property allows an APEX bundle to ignore the apex_available rules
defined in its dependencies, effectively allowing it to use any APEX
as its dependency.
Bug: 269660351
Test: m
Change-Id: Ib2797e04438ad908ac10b256dce07a7819e836b3
Previously, the symlink optimization for APEXes assumed that the target
of the symlinks are in the system partition. The assumption however
doesn't hold always because the file that was added to the APEX might be
with system_ext_specific: true or vendor: true.
Bug: 265598720
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ieb9a6769320c0ec697a88c0cae977e7d65288362
* changes:
Use the profiles in the APEX to dexpreopt system server jars.
Add tests for the ignored "profile_guided: true" property.
Output dex_preopt to SDK snapshot.
After this change, if "profile_guided: true" is set, profile-guided
compilation will be enabled for the jar and the ".prof" file next to
the jar in the APEX ("javalib/<name>.jar.prof") will be used as the
profile when dexpreopting for the prebuilt APEX.
Bug: 241823638
Test: m nothing
Test: -
1. (on internal master) Patch aosp/2426453.
2. Build the APEX bundle and the module SDK of com.android.wifi
3. (on tm-dev) Patch this CL and aosp/2141972.
4. Copy the APEX bundle and the module SDK built on step 2 to the
source tree
5. Disable hiddenapi check
6. lunch cf_x86_64_phone-userdebug && m MODULE_BUILD_FROM_SOURCE=false com.google.android.wifi
7. cat out/soong/.intermediates/prebuilts/module_sdk/Wifi/current/prebuilt_service-wifi/android_common_com.android.wifi/dexpreopt/oat/x86_64/javalib.invocation
8. See the profile being used.
Change-Id: I55a5a295e9c5d6f0564afb139c5fb7da91ab8cae
The tests in bootclasspath_fragment_test setup the environment to have
two APEXes: a source one and a prebuilt one. Before this change, the
tests for prebuilt incorrectly check the contents in the source one.
This change introduces a new function that properly checks files
deapexed from the prebuilt one.
Bug: 241823638
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I1865c20b198d50e7ebc8ebfb9f7c71394a225ab7
filesInfo should not be used for an apex that's converted to Bazel,
since all information should come from the Bazel starlark provider.
filesInfo is populated when there's a full Android.bp module graph of
the apex deps.
Test: presubmits
Change-Id: I4b9c596ca7841f4ea76e21f929039282113b6752
So that it can be used in the bazel implementation.
Bug: 268006095
Test: m nothing, check that it's in out/soong/soong_injection
Change-Id: I1520dd874076dee7fa083648d0790b060d658e5a
This reverts commit d1209a89c7.
Reason for revert: apex_name was still in use in the internal/intermediate branch. Fixed(removed apex_name) in the internal branch.
Change-Id: I10b8e0cfdb01dcdb6b623bddf9c04f4dac71fc90
After this change, if profile-guided compilation is enabled for an APEX
system server jar, the profile will be installed next to the jar with
the ".prof" suffix, ("javalib/<name>.jar.prof"). This file will later be
used by odrefresh and dexpreopt from prebuilt APEX.
Bug: 241823638
Test: m nothing
Test: -
1. Patch ag/20581649 PS2.
2. banchan com.android.btservices x86_64 && m
3. Check that "javalib/service-bluetooth.jar.prof" exists in the APEX.
Change-Id: Ibcfc6257dade92bd40a6d4b7368148717d0863b9
apex_name was used to install symbol files under /apex/<apex name>,
which caused duplicate rules when there's two apexes with the same
apex_name. (e.g. override_apex or multi-install apexes)
Since symbol files can be looked up via ELF Build-Id, we don't have to
install symbol files with the actual "apex name", but instead we can
install them with soong module name.
Bug: 267581665
Test: m (soong test)
Change-Id: I1cbe5c86d287f180c7deef93ba85ea5552680011
Previously in mixed builds, only the tidy files for the boundary module
were built, whereas all of its transitive dependencies' tidy files were
not being built. Instead we should export the list of transitive tidy
files for a module so that we can run clang-tidy for the boundary module
as well as its dependencies.
Bug: 195029134
Test: WITH_TIDY=1 DISABLE_ARTIFACT_PATH_REQUIREMENTS=true mss tidy-packages-modules-NeuralNetworks --bazel-mode-dev
Change-Id: I463646d2ae1fc4aa075a54c264e1c34571c3fd5c
This has been a workaround to avoid duplicate build rules for
multi-install apexes. The reason for duplicate errors was that apex_name
was used to install symbol files.
We don't need to rely on apex_name for symbol files, hence no need for
the workaround.
Note that symbol files for apexes are still available via the paths
based on "soong module name".
Bug: 267581665
Test: cuttlefish (which uses multi-apex) build & run
Change-Id: Icaca667e139ef2aca32339a75b54b12a00449c2d
VNDK APEX has been using "apex_name" property to set "name" field in
apex_manifest. But setting apex_name had a side-effect of emitting
duplicate rules for symbol files for VNDK APEX and its override_apex.
(Please see the removed comments for more details about error)
Not using "apex_name" fixes the duplicate errors.
There're a few more vendor apexes with the same issue, which I will
handle in follow-ups.
Bug: 267581665
Test: m (soong test) && boot
Change-Id: I00f617cef8af4d21880d4e8b9c0b9ab9322ba15c