Coverage build adds extra dependencies for the runtime libs. Marking
them and their transitive dependenciese with apex_available doesn't make
any value; it instead adds noise.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I08e51cec1de6ded624ef9d4c41c1e5b2e611ff38
The marked library(ies) were available to the adbd APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I6afbe905dda11056559521b937803dcd85b32fe5
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEXes via the hand-written
whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the whitelist
by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I91d1b1076733a949ca2a959ba640ce34d0233492
The NDK prebuilts are implicitly used when building with sdk_version set.
Make the module types be available to any apex so that we don't need to
manually add apex_available property to the module definitions manually.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I0870afa4c74b4a06ab1273dff84615778561ecc9
Revert submission 1254009-vdex-symlinks
Reason for revert: This causing some devices to fail to boot. See b/151836042 for details.
Reverted Changes:
Iced89071b:Expect vdex files in a target-independent director...
Ifbceb8457:Share vdex files in the ART apex between architect...
Change-Id: I5bd88f8e61d442eed921d840c90777a2750ddb16
Test: aosp_walleye-userdebug boots.
Test: Check symlinks to *.vdex files in the ART apex:
$ adb shell 'find /apex/com.android.art -name '*.vdex' | xargs ls -l'
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-apache-xml.vdex -> ../boot-apache-xml.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 25 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-bouncycastle.vdex -> ../boot-bouncycastle.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-core-icu4j.vdex -> ../boot-core-icu4j.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 24 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-core-libart.vdex -> ../boot-core-libart.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 19 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-okhttp.vdex -> ../boot-okhttp.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 12 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot.vdex -> ../boot.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-apache-xml.vdex -> ../boot-apache-xml.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 25 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-bouncycastle.vdex -> ../boot-bouncycastle.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-core-icu4j.vdex -> ../boot-core-icu4j.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 24 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-core-libart.vdex -> ../boot-core-libart.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 19 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-okhttp.vdex -> ../boot-okhttp.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 12 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot.vdex -> ../boot.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 1229 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-apache-xml.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 2043 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-bouncycastle.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 2883 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-core-icu4j.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 865 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-core-libart.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 395 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-okhttp.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 7125 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot.vdex
Bug: 150934453
Change-Id: Ifbceb845749f4c218693f4118e8b35b59ff26de1
libselinux no longer is included in any APEX. Only the platform variant
of it (/system/lib/libselinux.so) exists and APEXes link to it.
Removing the lib name from the whitelist to make it clear that the
library is not available to any APEX.
Bug: 151053366
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp
Merged-In: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
(cherry picked from commit 1731f6ae3f)
Change-Id: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
min_sdk_version = 29 implies that the module should support Android10.
Bug: 150431944
Test: m
Merged-In: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
Change-Id: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
(cherry picked from commit 5417f775e5)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Merged-In: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
(cherry picked from commit 03b5185b88)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: got ORV already.
libselinux no longer is included in any APEX. Only the platform variant
of it (/system/lib/libselinux.so) exists and APEXes link to it.
Removing the lib name from the whitelist to make it clear that the
library is not available to any APEX.
Bug: 151053366
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
Makes sure that the module snapshots do not rely on the white list
of apex available settings so that when those lists are removed it is
not necessary to update any snapshots.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Iedcff7dfc2646a4da77258d16e06657dd2f411f9
Test apexes no longer check to see whether their contents are available
so the special handling is no longer necessary.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Iecae7dcbb87908d19c672f74d3c1ed8810d4485b
The whitelistedApexAvailable used to map references to
com.android.art.debug/release to com.android.art before looking it up
in the white list. This change removed that mapping and simply added
both to the white list.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
Merged-In: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
NativeBridgeRelativePath should be appended after /bin or /lib and
before subdir.
Bug: N/A
Test: m (add a soong test)
Change-Id: Id0c44c66b4900caa291e816cf3361fdec8ff9421
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp/master
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Merged-In: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
(cherry picked from commit 5e9013be22)
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Merged-In: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
(cherry picked from commit 7bd9444b0f)
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
Add a min_sdk_version property apexes. Currently a noop, but will
be used to enforce that dependencies are compatible with the
specified version.
Test: m checkbuild
Bug: 149591522
Merged-In: I923773c90fe15becbffae3986791aa9edde8f8f6
Change-Id: I923773c90fe15becbffae3986791aa9edde8f8f6
(cherry picked from commit 50317874ff)
If an APEX contains APKs and the manifest package name of the APKs are
overridden (either via override_android_app
orPRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES), that the path to the APK
(relative in the APEX) and the overridden manifest package name is
recorded in the bundle config file.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from master
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Merged-In: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
(cherry picked from commit cfaa1643e8)
Change-Id: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
If an APEX contains APKs and the manifest package name of the APKs are
overridden (either via override_android_app
orPRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES), that the path to the APK
(relative in the APEX) and the overridden manifest package name is
recorded in the bundle config file.
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Change-Id: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
