Use of `--hide-annotation android.annotation.FlaggedApi` was always an
intermediate solution until the required semantics for `@FlaggedApi`
was determined. The `--revert-annotation` option provides those
semantics. When the `@FlaggedApi` is applied to an existing API, e.g.
because it has moved from system to public, or because it has changed
in some way, e.g. modifiers, then the correct semantics for when that
API is not required is not to hide the API but to revert it to what it
was before the change necessitating the `@FlaggedApi` annotation was
made.
Use --revert-annotation instead of --hide-annotation
Use of `--hide-annotation android.annotation.FlaggedApi` was always an
intermediate solution until the required semantics for `@FlaggedApi`
was determined. The `--revert-annotation` option provides those
semantics. When the `@FlaggedApi` is applied to an existing API, e.g.
because it has moved from system to public, or because it has changed
in some way, e.g. modifiers, then the correct semantics for when that
API is not required is not to hide the API but to revert it to what it
was before the change necessitating the `@FlaggedApi` annotation was
made.
Use --revert-annotation instead of --hide-annotation
Use of `--hide-annotation android.annotation.FlaggedApi` was always an
intermediate solution until the required semantics for `@FlaggedApi`
was determined. The `--revert-annotation` option provides those
semantics. When the `@FlaggedApi` is applied to an existing API, e.g.
because it has moved from system to public, or because it has changed
in some way, e.g. modifiers, then the correct semantics for when that
API is not required is not to hide the API but to revert it to what it
was before the change necessitating the `@FlaggedApi` annotation was
made.
Bug: 314196587
Test: ./gradlew
Change-Id: Ic97f29dd2b9f598ba0851f5f622c2a2724f18037
Remove the ConvertWithBp2build implementations from all the module
types, along with the related code.
Bug: 315353489
Test: m blueprint_tests
Change-Id: I212672286686a318893bc7348ddd5a5ec51e77a7
Compile_data is a property on rust rules to declare extra files
that are used by the compiler. In rust's case this happens commonly
with `include_str!()`.
Other compilers like javac or aapt2 don't often reach out to other
files, so it's not as neccessary. But they will follow symlinks.
We're making a change to only include symlinks themselves in sbox
sandboxes, and the targets of the symlinks must be listed
explicitly. For this, we need compile_data to list the targets
of symlinks.
Bug: 307824623
Test: m out/soong/.intermediates/frameworks/base/tools/aapt2/integration-tests/SymlinkTest/AaptSymlinkTest/android_common/lint/lint-baseline.xml with the symlink change
Change-Id: I33eb9cbe4b6eb25e3f33ea0ac9dade88c3d4a624
Also downgrade the new UseSdkSuppress check from error to warning.
And temporarily downgrades FlaggedApi from error to warning until
existing violations are resolved.
Test: The build
Bug: 303434307
Change-Id: Id7802621d567815470dee1aeb815abe214f098cd
This change adds an overrideable property flags_packages to android_app,
which is used to list the aconfig_declarations module names that the app
depends on. The build action of android_app is modified to pass all
flags text file provided by the aconfig_declarations to aapt2 link as
--feature-flags arguments.
Test: m nothing --no-skip-soong-tests
Bug: 306024510
Change-Id: I4924f88b9954950cc1936a472cd7ac70f41add5d
Passing the list of all transitive aconfig files to Make causes extra
Kati analysis runs when dependencies are changed in Android.bp files.
Since Make is going to merge them anyways, merge them per-module and
pass a single aconfig file to Make for each module.
Fixes: 313698230
Test: m out/target/product/vsoc_x86_64/system/etc/aconfig_flags.pb
Change-Id: Ifde4826bc93bc06e40338f72b4cb39eed26ca08d
This Cl adds a new rule to Soong to generate code ownership metadata. Also, this CL adds a provider in the Java SDK library to provide generated source files to the Code_metadata rule. Will add providers to other libraries in the future changes.
Bug: 296873595
Change-Id: Ic2e43aa9b161231fea4416d1f0d36b778361d7c5
The next CL will need a TestContext parameter in
ContentFromFileRuleForTests in order to retrieve the file rule contents
from the Config. Add it and update all the tests that use it in order
to simply review of the next CL.
Bug: 306029038
Test: go test ./...
Change-Id: Ia4b4c9854017ea3472fa2f8ba42cf7f72720496e
EngProd has indicated that we need to be included in that suite to
support TEST_MAPPING files in their infrastructure.
Bug: 308854804
Test: TH
Change-Id: I763b033f0f5f275091db45ab62df6af48dcddc66
