Previously, SdkSpec was constructed only from the user string. It didn't
make use of the Config struct where information about the latest stable
SDK version, etc. is recorded. As a result, the build system couldn't
check if the sdk version "current" is referring to the in-development
(i.e. not-yet-frozen) SDK version or the latest stable version.
"current" was always assumed to be in-development (IsPreview() returns
true) even when Platform_sdk_final == true.
As the first step for fixing that, this change requires
android.EarlyModuleContext to be passed when constructing SdkSpec from
the user string.
In the following changes, "current" will be mapped to either
FutureApiLevel (10000) or one of the FinalApiLevels() depending on
whether the platform SDK was finalized or not.
Bug: 175678607
Test: m
Change-Id: Ifea12ebf147ecccf12e7266dd382819806571543
This change fixes a bug that shared lib dependencies of an rlib is not
installed to the APEX even when the rlib is part of the APEX.
Bug: N/A
Test: m
Change-Id: I88fe461584499839d8018d6b4292374592e7562b
Previously, SdkSpec was constructed only from the user string. It didn't
make use of the Config struct where information about the latest stable
SDK version, etc. is recorded. As a result, the build system couldn't
check if the sdk version "current" is referring to the in-development
(i.e. not-yet-frozen) SDK version or the latest stable version.
"current" was always assumed to be in-development (IsPreview() returns
true) even when Platform_sdk_final == true.
As the first step for fixing that, this change requires
android.EarlyModuleContext to be passed when constructing SdkSpec from
the user string.
In the following changes, "current" will be mapped to either
FutureApiLevel (10000) or one of the FinalApiLevels() depending on
whether the platform SDK was finalized or not.
Bug: 175678607
Test: m
Change-Id: Ifea12ebf147ecccf12e7266dd382819806571543
When `test_for` dependencies are added from libraries to APEX modules,
they can be created from the platform variants of the libraries, since
those are used for building tests. Hence we need an alias from the
platform variant of the APEX module to have a target for those
dependencies.
This is only necessary for libraries that are split by the APEX
mutator, i.e. is a member of some APEX. Normally that's not the case
for test libraries, but there may be exceptions (read
com.android.art.testing).
This relands https://r.android.com/1654679 after decoupling it from the
topic that caused b/184239856.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 183882457
Change-Id: If643c75ce9bc25fa01ad9d1e3ba8e1d060d03bb2
Remove Android-targeting gcc toolchain libraries -- libgcc,
libgcc_stripped, libatomic, and libgcov. Also remove libunwind_llvm,
which is replaced with a libunwind toolchain prebuilt.
The __atomic_* library functions are now part of the compiler-rt
builtins library:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/toolchain/llvm_android/+/1625025
Bug: http://b/153025717
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I971d0a4a49f1aaeb3546e80b6d94208277a171ac
Revert submission 1658000
Reason for revert: Breaks full-eng build: b/184239856
Reverted Changes:
I4f8ead785:Avoid internal APEX stubs for libsigchain and clea...
I68affdf69:Allow dependencies from platform variants to APEX ...
I54b33784e:Rename libdexfile_external_static to libdexfile_st...
Id68ae9438:libdexfile_external is being replaced by libdexfil...
I12ac84eb4:libdexfile_external is replaced by libdexfile.
If05dbffc8:Rename libdexfile_external_static to libdexfile_st...
Ia011fa3a8:Merge libdexfile_external into libdexfile.
Change-Id: If494dc5385042a4620a76a9eadc1613ae0eb1655
When `test_for` dependencies are added from libraries to APEX modules,
they can be created from the platform variants of the libraries, since
those are used for building tests. Hence we need an alias from the
platform variant of the APEX module to have a target for those
dependencies.
This is only necessary for libraries that are split by the APEX
mutator, i.e. is a member of some APEX. Normally that's not the case
for test libraries, but there may be exceptions (read
com.android.art.testing).
Test: m nothing
Bug: 183882457
Change-Id: I68affdf69d7ec05c0ee8730e8ec04d7cb9e0e44a
This avoids having to specify boot libraries in both the boot_image
and separately as java_libs on the apex. Simply add them to the
boot_image (happens automatically ATM when using image_name: "art")
and add the boot_image to the apex.
Bug: 177892522
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I7e0c41665604b73780cdf0dc555067497b1e6ef0
This is part of the work to rename boot_image to bootclasspath_fragment
which is being done for two reasons:
1. To avoid clashing with the bootimg module type.
2. To better reflect what this represents.
While a bootclasspath_fragment can create what ART calls a boot image
(which is different to what the bootimg module type represents) it does
not have to do so.
Bug: 177892522
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ib45604be7adc790ded9e27a2ac812dd7522ca8db
Creates a new deptag type for it so that it can implement the marker
interfaces that will exclude it from being added to the APEX and from
visibility enforcement. The latter is probably not an issue ATM because
the dependencies are added after visibility checks are enforced but
this code is undergoing lots of refactoring so that may change.
Bug: 177892522
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ibd167d557adec761a2e3eed78f4d334c40a04fb9
The ExcludeFromApexContentsTag marker interface was added to avoid
every implementation of DepIsInSameApex() from having to deal with the
special tags, like PrebuiltDepTag. Unfortunately, when adding that
not all calls to DepIsInSameApex() were protected which meant that the
BootImageModule, which panics if it doesn't recognize a tag, was
causing failures. This change documents the need and improves the
consistency.
A follow up change will add a test for this.
Bug: 182992071
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: If0bf9a7447ebf7a0bb0c88e91951a7220d4af45c
Adds the AlwaysRequireApexVariantTag interface to enable
ApexInfoMutator to differentiate between a tag that is excluded from
apex contents but still requires an apex variant and a tag that is
excluded from apex contents and does not require an apex variant.
That is needed to support the sdkMemberVersionedDepTag which excludes
the target from being added to the APEX but requires an APEX variant.
A more detailed explanation is in the comments.
The AlwaysRequireApexVariant() method follows the pattern used in
ReplaceSourceWithPrebuilt of having a method that returns a bool to
trigger the behavior and not say ExcludeFromApexContentsTag that simply
relies on the tag implementing an interface to trigger. That is because
the former is more flexible and allows a tag type to parameterize the
behavior if necessary.
The tags that this will exclude from creating an apex variant are:
* PrebuiltDepTag - by the time the apex variant has been created any
preferred prebuilts will have replaced the sources so there is no
need to create an APEX variant if the only dependency path from the
APEX to the prebuilt is via this tag.
* hiddenApiAnnotationsDependencyTag - the target of which is a purely
build time artifect and MUST NEVER end up in the APEX.
It will also stop calling DepIsInSameApex for any dependency created
by the sdkMemberVersionedDepTag. Which will fix the issue reported in
the bug.
Bug: 182992071
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I9569e488d6446ca45d3ea8f32a9b74524eb865df
It just provides the metadata needed by the global singleton as the
rest is in the apex.
Bug: 182402754
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I511df7a3a06dab13ddb9ad63392ae5310dfee9c4
An upcoming change to create a prebuilt_platform_compat_config module
will break if the apex tries to use it instead of a
platform_compat_config because the former does not provide all the
information that the apex needs. This change will allow the
compatConfigsTag to be configured to prevent the prebuilt from being
used even when it is preferred.
Bug: 182402754
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ib9dc06c038f7cf3fc229f3c4d2b025335a4715b4
While debugging an issue with some work I was doing on boot image
modules I noticed that markPlatformAvailability() is calling
DepIsInSameApex() even when the dependency tag indicates that it is
excluded from the apex contents.
Test: m droid
Change-Id: Iac49049546a886f7a3a0d9640ffd31ce24c61364
1) suggest a fix at the end of the message
2) add new lines around the dependency path so that they are visually
separated from rest of the error message
Bug: N/A
Test: m with an intentional break
error: bionic/apex/Android.bp:32:1: module "com.android.runtime" variant "android_common_com.android.runtime_image": "libutils_headers" requires "libsystem_headers" that doesn't list the APEX under 'apex_available'.
Dependency path:
via tag apex.dependencyTag: { name:executable payload:true}
-> crash_dump{os:android,image:,arch:arm_armv8-a,sdk:,apex:apex10000}
via tag cc.libraryDependencyTag: { Kind:staticLibraryDependency Order:normalLibraryDependency wholeStatic:false reexportFlags:false explicitlyVersioned:false dataLib:false ndk:false staticUnwinder:false makeSuffix: skipApexAllowedDependenciesCheck:false excludeInApex:false}
-> libtombstoned_client_static{os:android,image:,arch:arm_armv8-a,sdk:,link:static,apex:apex10000}
via tag cc.libraryDependencyTag: { Kind:staticLibraryDependency Order:normalLibraryDependency wholeStatic:true reexportFlags:true explicitlyVersioned:false dataLib:false ndk:false staticUnwinder:false makeSuffix: skipApexAllowedDependenciesCheck:false excludeInApex:false}
-> libcutils{os:android,image:,arch:arm_armv8-a,sdk:,link:static,asan:,apex:apex10000}
via tag cc.libraryDependencyTag: { Kind:headerLibraryDependency Order:normalLibraryDependency wholeStatic:false reexportFlags:false explicitlyVersioned:false dataLib:false ndk:false staticUnwinder:false makeSuffix: skipApexAllowedDependenciesCheck:false excludeInApex:false}
-> libutils_headers{os:android,image:,arch:arm_armv8-a,sdk:,asan:,apex:apex10000}
via tag cc.libraryDependencyTag: { Kind:headerLibraryDependency Order:normalLibraryDependency wholeStatic:false reexportFlags:true explicitlyVersioned:false dataLib:false ndk:false staticUnwinder:false makeSuffix: skipApexAllowedDependenciesCheck:false excludeInApex:false}
-> libsystem_headers{os:android,image:,arch:arm_armv8-a,sdk:,asan:,apex:apex10000}
Consider adding "com.android.runtime" to 'apex_available' property of "libsystem_headers"
Change-Id: I09f92c3086ea433780133a33ba0ad73baee6dc41