Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference
them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl,
stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars.
Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for
most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them
directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as
that is created the JSL itself.
Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up
the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and
maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is
a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe.
That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX
as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated
together so compatibility is not an issue.
This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the
implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will
allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of
this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use
for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build
from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate
module.
It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more
restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse.
Bug: 156618935
Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test
tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module
Merged-In: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
(cherry picked from commit 5df793011d)
Introduce a singleton apex rule to merge contents of individual
deps-info results into a single output file.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m
Change-Id: I4ab7e1a3527fead97a81a5a2cb0e1e93a429117c
Merged-In: I4ab7e1a3527fead97a81a5a2cb0e1e93a429117c
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit 849f844252)
For a given variant of a module that implements ApexModule interface,
the "updatable" property tests if this variant comes from an updatable
apex. For platform variants it is always false.
Test: lunch aosp_walleye-userdebug && m nothing
Bug: 138994281
Merged-In: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
Change-Id: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit 7c140d828a)
Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference
them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl,
stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars.
Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for
most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them
directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as
that is created the JSL itself.
Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up
the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and
maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is
a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe.
That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX
as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated
together so compatibility is not an issue.
This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the
implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will
allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of
this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use
for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build
from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate
module.
It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more
restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse.
Bug: 156618935
Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test
tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module
Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
Previously, droiddoc was using SdkImplementationJars() to get a JAR to
add to the classpath in order to resolve unknown references in the
source.
Given that SdkHeaderJars() returns jars created by Turbine which are
(for compilation at least) functionally identical to the implementation
jars there is no point in using the implementation jars.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I2b718cc1445c04e849dcb0b1f53bba2b0bd90c95
Change-Id: I2b718cc1445c04e849dcb0b1f53bba2b0bd90c95
(cherry picked from commit 649dadfb87)
Access to the implementation JARs is restricted to avoid code from
depending on implementation details that could change from one release
to the next which could cause compatibility issues. That is not a
problem when referenced from within the APEX that contains the
java_sdk_library.
As references from within the same APEX often need to access
implementation specific details of the java_sdk_library and doing that
from within the same APEX is safe this change all references to a
java_sdk_library made within the same APEX to use the implementation
jars instead of stub jars.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If239059690de61683c2ad2d8a0ce2e47286a3637
(cherry picked from commit 9b879594ed)
The implementation jars are not built if api_only: true. In that case
the jar paths must not be exposed implicitly as they will be nil and
they will just be ignored.
This change ensures that stubs are returned when the implementation
jars are not built.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: Ic495982a5dcb2754916260e7d91d921a5da288ae
(cherry picked from commit daaa332827)
I made a mistake and only fixed android_test_import in my previous
change, I5bbb2d2b733bbd6b868898285683ba5ff45be10b.
Bug: 154281342
Test: TreeHugger
Test: chromium-webview
Change-Id: I1575d9ef3f8596f1eb8db0867db09de08945d711
The expression !sdkVersion.specified() is equivalent to the following:
!sdkVersion.valid() || sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate
That means that the else if clause "sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate" will
never be reached so it was removed.
There is also no need to check sdkVersion.valid() as that will already
have been checked, and an error reported, before this code has been
called. Therefore that has been removed.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ib7c544b48dfb53bad3e15f9f73f71bd05cff9b49
Change-Id: Ib7c544b48dfb53bad3e15f9f73f71bd05cff9b49
(cherry picked from commit c91f5d0cc7)
Previously, droiddoc was using SdkImplementationJars() to get a JAR to
add to the classpath in order to resolve unknown references in the
source.
Given that SdkHeaderJars() returns jars created by Turbine which are
(for compilation at least) functionally identical to the implementation
jars there is no point in using the implementation jars.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I2b718cc1445c04e849dcb0b1f53bba2b0bd90c95
Access to the implementation JARs is restricted to avoid code from
depending on implementation details that could change from one release
to the next which could cause compatibility issues. That is not a
problem when referenced from within the APEX that contains the
java_sdk_library.
As references from within the same APEX often need to access
implementation specific details of the java_sdk_library and doing that
from within the same APEX is safe this change all references to a
java_sdk_library made within the same APEX to use the implementation
jars instead of stub jars.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If239059690de61683c2ad2d8a0ce2e47286a3637
The implementation jars are not built if api_only: true. In that case
the jar paths must not be exposed implicitly as they will be nil and
they will just be ignored.
This change ensures that stubs are returned when the implementation
jars are not built.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: Ic495982a5dcb2754916260e7d91d921a5da288ae
Since the metalava invocations have been merged into a single one,
and checkapi already requires the other timestamp, this has no effect.
Bug: 151160048
Test: m checkapi
Change-Id: I560058f0f4cdeaedaf247cd35119da2cf0b86ea0
The expression !sdkVersion.specified() is equivalent to the following:
!sdkVersion.valid() || sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate
That means that the else if clause "sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate" will
never be reached so it was removed.
There is also no need to check sdkVersion.valid() as that will already
have been checked, and an error reported, before this code has been
called. Therefore that has been removed.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ib7c544b48dfb53bad3e15f9f73f71bd05cff9b49
Bug: b/156613606
Test: build with and without RBE_JAVAC/RBE_R8/RBE_D8 set.
Change-Id: I1607f8cfb4d2c3cbb3672152bbeb561d9968bc60
Merged-In: I1607f8cfb4d2c3cbb3672152bbeb561d9968bc60
Module stubs compile against module_current, so any module depending on
them had to compile against module_current (or broader) too. Treat them
as the API surface the stubs are for.
Bug: 157010342
Test: m
Change-Id: I49b9082dc1b5afe6c22e94126e574dd8061f0f39
