This reverts commit 380fc3615c.
Reason for revert: breaking one of internal targets
Change-Id: Ica96c44078e5a7f674410828af3ba851317775dd
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: revert to fix build failure
This change fixes a bug that license info for statically linked
libraries are absent in the merged notice for APEX. The problem was that
we were iterating over the apexFiles list that represents actual files
(not Soong modules) that are included in the APEX. The problem is now
fixed by iterarting the all the modules that directly or indirectly
contribute to the APEX using walkPayloadDeps() function.
Bug: 149455933
Test: m
Merged-In: I38655da62b590b669ab4649815b61a5a8e314154
(cherry picked from commit 9918e1afd7)
Change-Id: I38655da62b590b669ab4649815b61a5a8e314154
This change fixes a bug that license info for statically linked
libraries are absent in the merged notice for APEX. The problem was that
we were iterating over the apexFiles list that represents actual files
(not Soong modules) that are included in the APEX. The problem is now
fixed by iterarting the all the modules that directly or indirectly
contribute to the APEX using walkPayloadDeps() function.
Bug: 149455933
Test: m
Change-Id: I38655da62b590b669ab4649815b61a5a8e314154
Even though use_vendor:true is prohibited, there is media.swcodec apex
which is still use_vendor: true and also needs to support Android10.
(min_sdk_version: 29)
Because LLNDK stubs were provided only for the current VNDK version,
media.swcodec couldn't be built against min_sdk_version: 29.
This change introduces additional versions for LLNDK stubs which are
enforced when an apex with use_vendor: true sets min_sdk_version.
To make things easier, the versions of LLNDK stubs are borrowed from its
implementation libraries.
Bug: 147450930
Bug: 149591522
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.media.swcodec m
(with min_sdk_version: 29 set)
check if liblog/libc/libm/libdl stubs are 29
check if 29 stubs don't have new symbols.
Change-Id: I79946cbb4da6617138a96d2b254349d3a298e77b
sdk_version is passed for relevant variants.
If not specified or "current",
it maps to "10000" for platform variants, and
"min_sdk_version" of the apex for apex variants.
Bug: 150860940
Test: m (soong test)
manually check build.ninja
Merged-In: I5102ab0c5086b5ad29d16ac45af55d32062167b4
Change-Id: I5102ab0c5086b5ad29d16ac45af55d32062167b4
(cherry picked from commit ccce2f2c23)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
This is rarely used feature but cost alot for the local build and build
inra.
Bug: 150506627
Test: m
Merged-In: Iec3ada4a97c7b228f2818563fa0e81b407f2715a
Change-Id: Iec3ada4a97c7b228f2818563fa0e81b407f2715a
(cherry picked from commit c87a059c88)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
min_sdk_version = 29 implies that the module should support Android10.
Bug: 150431944
Test: m
Merged-In: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
Change-Id: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
(cherry picked from commit 5417f775e5)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
ensureExactContents shouldn't return immediately when it finds a match
from expected list of files.
Bug: 151491839
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ie15c811f9cfcae7ede28dee0fcf203cee24659a0
Change-Id: Ie15c811f9cfcae7ede28dee0fcf203cee24659a0
(cherry picked from commit e6436d7bf0)
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Merged-In: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
(cherry picked from commit 03b5185b88)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: got ORV already.
When there is a runtime depedency (via runtime_libs property) to a
library providing stable C APIs, the dependency is considered as
crossing APEX boundary. Therefore, the requested lib doesn't need to be
made available to the APEX where the requesting lib is in.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp, approved there.
Bug: 147813447
Test: m
Merged-In: I9cf8a5877850fb85b92c851e15fac921b8b7641b
(cherry picked from commit 323a4c3ab3)
Change-Id: I9cf8a5877850fb85b92c851e15fac921b8b7641b
NativeBridgeRelativePath should be appended after /bin or /lib and
before subdir.
Bug: N/A
Test: m (add a soong test)
Change-Id: Id0c44c66b4900caa291e816cf3361fdec8ff9421
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp/master
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Merged-In: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
(cherry picked from commit 5e9013be22)
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Merged-In: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
(cherry picked from commit 7bd9444b0f)
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
sdk_version is passed for relevant variants.
If not specified or "current",
it maps to "10000" for platform variants, and
"min_sdk_version" of the apex for apex variants.
Bug: 150860940
Test: m (soong test)
manually check build.ninja
Change-Id: I5102ab0c5086b5ad29d16ac45af55d32062167b4
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
apex { name: "foo" }
override_apex { name: "override_foo", base:"foo" }
PRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES := foo:com.android.foo
Previously, the override was done only for the overridden package "foo",
but not for "override_foo". Fixing this issue by using ctx.ModuleName()
when finding the package name to use.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 150645663
Test: m
Merged-In: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
(cherry picked from commit a519c54dd3)
Change-Id: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
apex { name: "foo" }
override_apex { name: "override_foo", base:"foo" }
PRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES := foo:com.android.foo
Previously, the override was done only for the overridden package "foo",
but not for "override_foo". Fixing this issue by using ctx.ModuleName()
when finding the package name to use.
Bug: 150645663
Test: m
Change-Id: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
This is rarely used feature but cost alot for the local build and build
inra.
Bug: 150506627
Test: m
Change-Id: Iec3ada4a97c7b228f2818563fa0e81b407f2715a
When there is a runtime depedency (via runtime_libs property) to a
library providing stable C APIs, the dependency is considered as
crossing APEX boundary. Therefore, the requested lib doesn't need to be
made available to the APEX where the requesting lib is in.
Bug: 147813447
Test: m
Change-Id: I9cf8a5877850fb85b92c851e15fac921b8b7641b
If an APEX contains APKs and the manifest package name of the APKs are
overridden (either via override_android_app
orPRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES), that the path to the APK
(relative in the APEX) and the overridden manifest package name is
recorded in the bundle config file.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from master
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Merged-In: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
(cherry picked from commit cfaa1643e8)
Change-Id: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
bundle config file for apexes are auto-generated. It is included in the
<apex>-base.zip file, which is expected to be extracted and then fed
into the bundletool.
This change is in preparation for the upcoming change to include
information about embedded apks in the bundle confir file.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from master
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Merged-In: If25d75e0f62036dc777faf8593ed8eb9a74950b0
(cherry picked from commit bd15961043)
Change-Id: If25d75e0f62036dc777faf8593ed8eb9a74950b0
If an APEX contains APKs and the manifest package name of the APKs are
overridden (either via override_android_app
orPRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES), that the path to the APK
(relative in the APEX) and the overridden manifest package name is
recorded in the bundle config file.
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Change-Id: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
bundle config file for apexes are auto-generated. It is included in the
<apex>-base.zip file, which is expected to be extracted and then fed
into the bundletool.
This change is in preparation for the upcoming change to include
information about embedded apks in the bundle confir file.
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Change-Id: If25d75e0f62036dc777faf8593ed8eb9a74950b0
Which is the list of JNI libraries that are embeded inside the apex.
jni_libs is handled just like native_shared_libs except that it is
stored in apex_manifest.
When linkerconfig finds an apex with JNI libs, it exposes the namespace
for the apex as visible so that libnativeloader can link the namespace
to the corresponding classloader-namespace.
Bug: 149363889
Test: m nothing(runs soong test)
Change-Id: I52ebe38b44545e6e8853e34a3404a235c858112a
ensureExactContent shouldn't return immediately when it finds a match
from expected list of files.
Bug: N/A
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ie15c811f9cfcae7ede28dee0fcf203cee24659a0
Because APK-in-APEX embeds its jni_libs in it. We don't have to follow
deps of jni_libs.
Bug: 146992436
Test: m com.android.tethering
deapexer extract com.android.tethering.apex apex
ls apex # there should be no /lib dir
Merged-In: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
Change-Id: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
(cherry picked from commit b7bebe2616)
Because APK-in-APEX embeds its jni_libs in it. We don't have to follow
deps of jni_libs.
Bug: 146992436
Test: m com.android.tethering
deapexer extract com.android.tethering.apex apex
ls apex # there should be no /lib dir
Change-Id: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
Apps that expect to run on older platforms should use JNI libraries
that will also run on older platforms. Require that apps that set
sdk_version have jni_libs modules that also set sdk_version, or
set jni_uses_platform_apis: true to bypass the check.
Fixes: 149591057
Test: app_test.go
Change-Id: I76b9b45fb5773bc4dfc10520108f4f3578723909
The optimization is confusing syshealth because the modules will use
more memory when they are switched to the prebuilt (unbundled) or
updated via Play.
Let's have a per-module switch to control the behavior and turn it on
only for non-updatable modules like ART.
Bug: 149805758
Test: m
Change-Id: Ieb842c47f31f3b06e403b1e1f9e463c3e5524107
This change fixes a regression that was introduced with
I597bccbb177b6b6320c3a3edeff467243230d384. With the change, the content
of the permissions XML file for a java_sdk_library was determined before
the java_sdk_library is mutated for an APEX. As a result, the file path
to the implementation jar library was always set to
/system/framework/*.jar regardless of whether the java_sdk_library is
part of an APEX or not.
This change fixes the problem, by creating the permissions XML file via
a new module type. The content of the xml file is determined after the
xml file is mutated for APEXes.
Bug: 149600642
Test: m
Change-Id: Id21f8d8285df49b0b3be1daf0f101f2bc978eeb0
Bug: 149075752
Test: tapas com.android.conscrypt com.android.tethering arm64
Test: m out/target/product/generic_arm64/{,symbols/}apex/com.android.{tethering,conscrypt}/lib64/libc++.so
Test: Verified that unwinder was dynamically linked to tethering's
Test: libc++ and statically linked to conscrypt's.
Test: lunch flame-userdebug && m
Test: Verified that unwinder was dynamically linked to /system/lib64/libc++.so
Change-Id: I98eed7cb4316962b19b5c12e150c224c25d0e91d
