Switching an updatable boot jar from java_library to java_sdk_library
changed the contents of the updatable-bcp-packages.txt due to the code
requiring the module to be *Library. This change updates that to allow
it to be any module that implements the
PermittedPackagesForUpdatableBootJars interface which is *Library and
anything that embeds that like *SdkLibrary.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid and check the contents of system/etc/updatable-bcp-packages.txt
Change-Id: I464af74628da311734f102f77ec8158daec5b32d
Package checks were not being run for java libraries that were in an
APEX and not on the platform. This change fixes that and updates the
script to report all failing classes to make it easier to update the
list of packages.
Test: m java
Bug: 157633658
Change-Id: I28044e08d3a40e9f3464bb2158ef6a28d57264d1
(cherry picked from commit 63d8febd35)
Passes the shared_library property through to the snapshot. It does not
optimize away the default value in order to make it easier to invert
the default value in future. The current default value was only chosen
for convenience because most existing usages were already treated as
shared libraries. It would be safer if modules had to opt in to be used
as shared libraries.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I33c7323f2389b44ed49cebe517ae2cce349117f1
Change-Id: I33c7323f2389b44ed49cebe517ae2cce349117f1
(cherry picked from commit d7eb1c2a76)
Previously, when a lib that doesn't have sdk_version property set
depends on a java_sdk_library, the impl library was used for linking.
This might be too permissive because the client lib might be using empty
sdk_version because it needed some private APIs from the platform, but
not from the java_sdk_library. This actually happend for some of the CTS
tests. They don't set sdk_version, but were directly depending on
android.test.[base|runner|mock].stubs libraries. If we switch the
references to the stub libraries into the corresponding java_sdk_library
modules (e.g. aandroid.test.[base|runner|mock]), then we would be
allowing private APIs to the CTS tests, which is not good.
To solve this problem, default_to_stub property is introduced. It when set
to true prevents the impl lib from being used for linking. When a module
that doesn't have sdk_version depends on it, the widest API surface that
the java_sdk_library provides is linked instead.
Bug: 157007292
Test: m
Merged-In: Id2acc3cafb71d1e90d4fdc9c0c70a73983355e0f
Change-Id: Id2acc3cafb71d1e90d4fdc9c0c70a73983355e0f
(cherry picked from commit 932cdfeb06)
apex now respects stem of java_library modules.
As a follow-up we need to suppor the same for other types of modules.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 157638999
Test: m
Merged-In: Iaf5023020b5440f1ffd4f5414b5a7864655fc22a
(cherry picked from commit a62aa23990)
Change-Id: Iaf5023020b5440f1ffd4f5414b5a7864655fc22a
"current" is converted to int differently if we use
sdkSpec.effectiveVersion for APK and android.ApiStrToNum for JNI.
For example, in REL branch, "current" is equiv to PlatformSdkVersion
for APK, but 10000(FutureApiVersion) for JNI.
Use sdkSpec.effectiveVersion to compare APK.min_sdk_version and
JNI.sdk_version.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m
Change-Id: I2c4dbb79ae8712004dc3a9e647aa53cd5de7b508
JNI libs for "updatable" APKs or APKs in "updatable" APEXes should set
sdk_version which is equal to or less than APK's min_sdk_version.
In fact, we'd better check if min_sdk_version of JNI libs matches(or is
earlier than) min_sdk_version of the APK. But for now the build system
can't handle sdk_version/min_sdk_version correctly for JNI libs. That's
why sdk_version of JNI libs is enforced to match with min_sdk_version
of APK in this change.
(original commit: 98c4750f39)
Bug: 145796956
Test: m
Merged-In: I08543ccee7dfda0559a1fca108ceb5c28f84943f
Change-Id: I08543ccee7dfda0559a1fca108ceb5c28f84943f
(cherry picked from commit bbc3fb780b)
apex now respects stem of java_library modules.
As a follow-up we need to suppor the same for other types of modules.
Bug: 157638999
Test: m
Change-Id: Iaf5023020b5440f1ffd4f5414b5a7864655fc22a
Previously, when a lib that doesn't have sdk_version property set
depends on a java_sdk_library, the impl library was used for linking.
This might be too permissive because the client lib might be using empty
sdk_version because it needed some private APIs from the platform, but
not from the java_sdk_library. This actually happend for some of the CTS
tests. They don't set sdk_version, but were directly depending on
android.test.[base|runner|mock].stubs libraries. If we switch the
references to the stub libraries into the corresponding java_sdk_library
modules (e.g. aandroid.test.[base|runner|mock]), then we would be
allowing private APIs to the CTS tests, which is not good.
To solve this problem, default_to_stub property is introduced. It when set
to true prevents the impl lib from being used for linking. When a module
that doesn't have sdk_version depends on it, the widest API surface that
the java_sdk_library provides is linked instead.
Bug: 157007292
Test: m
Change-Id: Id2acc3cafb71d1e90d4fdc9c0c70a73983355e0f
I made a mistake and only fixed android_test_import in my previous
change, I5bbb2d2b733bbd6b868898285683ba5ff45be10b.
(This is a cherry-pick change.)
Bug: 154281342
Test: TreeHugger
Test: chromium-webview
Change-Id: I1575d9ef3f8596f1eb8db0867db09de08945d711
Merged-In: I1575d9ef3f8596f1eb8db0867db09de08945d711
Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference
them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl,
stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars.
Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for
most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them
directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as
that is created the JSL itself.
Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up
the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and
maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is
a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe.
That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX
as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated
together so compatibility is not an issue.
This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the
implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will
allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of
this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use
for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build
from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate
module.
It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more
restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse.
Bug: 156618935
Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test
tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module
Merged-In: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
(cherry picked from commit 5df793011d)
Introduce a singleton apex rule to merge contents of individual
deps-info results into a single output file.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m
Change-Id: I4ab7e1a3527fead97a81a5a2cb0e1e93a429117c
Merged-In: I4ab7e1a3527fead97a81a5a2cb0e1e93a429117c
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit 849f844252)
For a given variant of a module that implements ApexModule interface,
the "updatable" property tests if this variant comes from an updatable
apex. For platform variants it is always false.
Test: lunch aosp_walleye-userdebug && m nothing
Bug: 138994281
Merged-In: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
Change-Id: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit 7c140d828a)
Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference
them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl,
stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars.
Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for
most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them
directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as
that is created the JSL itself.
Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up
the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and
maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is
a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe.
That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX
as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated
together so compatibility is not an issue.
This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the
implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will
allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of
this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use
for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build
from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate
module.
It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more
restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse.
Bug: 156618935
Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test
tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module
Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
