Apex can use codenames like "Q", "R" for its min_sdk_version property.
Also, cc_library can use codenames for its stubs.versions.
Bug: 152655956
Test: vendor/google/build/build_mainline_modules.sh
Change-Id: I077ad7b2ac5d90b4c8708921e43846206f05ba70
Previously, when Q-targeting apexes are bundled-built, they are built
against the latest stubs.
It was because unwinder is linked dynamically in R and APIs are provided
by libc while Q apexes should run on Q where libc doesn't provide those
APIs. To make Q apexes run on Q device, libc++ should be linked with
static unwinder. But, because libc++ with static unwinder may cause problem
on HWASAN build, Q apexes were built against the latest stubs for bundled
build.
However, Q apexes should be built against Q stubs.
Now, only for HWASAN builds, Q apexes are built against the latest stubs
(and native modules are not linked with static unwinder).
Bug: 151912436
Test: TARGET_SANITIZE=hwaddress m
=> Q apexes(media, resolv, ..) are linked with the latest stubs
m
=> Q apexes are linked with Q stubs,
and Q apexes' libc++ is linked with static unwinder
Merged-In: If32f1b547e6d93e3955c7521eec8aef5851f908c
Change-Id: If32f1b547e6d93e3955c7521eec8aef5851f908c
(cherry picked from commit 7406660685)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from internal
Change-Id: If32f1b547e6d93e3955c7521eec8aef5851f908c
Compiling native modules against the NDK disables platform features
like ASAN. For anything shipped on the system image there is no
reason to compile against the NDK. Add a new mutator to Soong that
creates a platform and an SDK variant for modules that set
sdk_version, and ignore sdk_version for the platform variant. The
SDK variant will be used for embedding in APKs that may be installed
on older platforms. Apexes use their own variants that enforce
backwards compatibility.
Test: sdk_test.go
Test: TestJNIPackaging
Bug: 149591340
Change-Id: I7d72934aaee2e1326cc0ba5f29f51f14feec4521
The apex available check can traverse quite a long path (5+ steps) to
get from the apex to a module that is missing the apex from its
apex_available property. Understanding where that dependency came from
can often require examining the dependency path which can be difficult.
This change adds the path to the error to simplify that process.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 152762638
Change-Id: Ic4eb169dc2026cd8339d49e23b25d6d1c3879750
Having multiple tests within one method makes debugging specific
failures more difficult so this change split the TestApexAvailable
test into multiple separate tests.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 152762638
Change-Id: I2b2408ef515fd79c078686ef29a6ee8fb0407e7e
Previously, when Q-targeting apexes are bundled-built, they are built
against the latest stubs.
It was because unwinder is linked dynamically in R and APIs are provided
by libc while Q apexes should run on Q where libc doesn't provide those
APIs. To make Q apexes run on Q device, libc++ should be linked with
static unwinder. But, because libc++ with static unwinder may cause problem
on HWASAN build, Q apexes were built against the latest stubs for bundled
build.
However, Q apexes should be built against Q stubs.
Now, only for HWASAN builds, Q apexes are built against the latest stubs
(and native modules are not linked with static unwinder).
Bug: 151912436
Test: TARGET_SANITIZE=hwaddress m
=> Q apexes(media, resolv, ..) are linked with the latest stubs
m
=> Q apexes are linked with Q stubs,
and Q apexes' libc++ is linked with static unwinder
Change-Id: If32f1b547e6d93e3955c7521eec8aef5851f908c
The macro is required only for apex variants regardless of useVndk.
Before the enforcement of LLNDK sdk version, the macro was not passed to
vendor variants.
Bug: 151689896
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.media.swcodec m
libbase in swcodec apex is linked with liblog#29
(compiled with __ANDROID_SDK_VERSIO__=29)
Merged-In: I57fa4afe027eb39b98bd94d534be9ebe11713f19
Change-Id: I57fa4afe027eb39b98bd94d534be9ebe11713f19
(cherry picked from commit 24282778ee)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
Even though use_vendor:true is prohibited, there is media.swcodec apex
which is still use_vendor: true and also needs to support Android10.
(min_sdk_version: 29)
Because LLNDK stubs were provided only for the current VNDK version,
media.swcodec couldn't be built against min_sdk_version: 29.
This change introduces additional versions for LLNDK stubs which are
enforced when an apex with use_vendor: true sets min_sdk_version.
To make things easier, the versions of LLNDK stubs are borrowed from its
implementation libraries.
Bug: 147450930
Bug: 149591522
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.media.swcodec m
(with min_sdk_version: 29 set)
check if liblog/libc/libm/libdl stubs are 29
check if 29 stubs don't have new symbols.
Merged-In: I79946cbb4da6617138a96d2b254349d3a298e77b
Change-Id: I79946cbb4da6617138a96d2b254349d3a298e77b
(cherry picked from commit 380fc3615c)
The macro is required only for apex variants regardless of useVndk.
Before the enforcement of LLNDK sdk version, the macro was not passed to
vendor variants.
Bug: 151689896
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.media.swcodec m
libbase in swcodec apex is linked with liblog#29
(compiled with __ANDROID_SDK_VERSIO__=29)
Change-Id: I57fa4afe027eb39b98bd94d534be9ebe11713f19
This reverts commit 380fc3615c.
Reason for revert: breaking one of internal targets
Change-Id: Ica96c44078e5a7f674410828af3ba851317775dd
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: revert to fix build failure
This change fixes a bug that license info for statically linked
libraries are absent in the merged notice for APEX. The problem was that
we were iterating over the apexFiles list that represents actual files
(not Soong modules) that are included in the APEX. The problem is now
fixed by iterarting the all the modules that directly or indirectly
contribute to the APEX using walkPayloadDeps() function.
Bug: 149455933
Test: m
Merged-In: I38655da62b590b669ab4649815b61a5a8e314154
(cherry picked from commit 9918e1afd7)
Change-Id: I38655da62b590b669ab4649815b61a5a8e314154
This change fixes a bug that license info for statically linked
libraries are absent in the merged notice for APEX. The problem was that
we were iterating over the apexFiles list that represents actual files
(not Soong modules) that are included in the APEX. The problem is now
fixed by iterarting the all the modules that directly or indirectly
contribute to the APEX using walkPayloadDeps() function.
Bug: 149455933
Test: m
Change-Id: I38655da62b590b669ab4649815b61a5a8e314154
Even though use_vendor:true is prohibited, there is media.swcodec apex
which is still use_vendor: true and also needs to support Android10.
(min_sdk_version: 29)
Because LLNDK stubs were provided only for the current VNDK version,
media.swcodec couldn't be built against min_sdk_version: 29.
This change introduces additional versions for LLNDK stubs which are
enforced when an apex with use_vendor: true sets min_sdk_version.
To make things easier, the versions of LLNDK stubs are borrowed from its
implementation libraries.
Bug: 147450930
Bug: 149591522
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.media.swcodec m
(with min_sdk_version: 29 set)
check if liblog/libc/libm/libdl stubs are 29
check if 29 stubs don't have new symbols.
Change-Id: I79946cbb4da6617138a96d2b254349d3a298e77b
sdk_version is passed for relevant variants.
If not specified or "current",
it maps to "10000" for platform variants, and
"min_sdk_version" of the apex for apex variants.
Bug: 150860940
Test: m (soong test)
manually check build.ninja
Merged-In: I5102ab0c5086b5ad29d16ac45af55d32062167b4
Change-Id: I5102ab0c5086b5ad29d16ac45af55d32062167b4
(cherry picked from commit ccce2f2c23)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
This is rarely used feature but cost alot for the local build and build
inra.
Bug: 150506627
Test: m
Merged-In: Iec3ada4a97c7b228f2818563fa0e81b407f2715a
Change-Id: Iec3ada4a97c7b228f2818563fa0e81b407f2715a
(cherry picked from commit c87a059c88)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
min_sdk_version = 29 implies that the module should support Android10.
Bug: 150431944
Test: m
Merged-In: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
Change-Id: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
(cherry picked from commit 5417f775e5)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
ensureExactContents shouldn't return immediately when it finds a match
from expected list of files.
Bug: 151491839
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ie15c811f9cfcae7ede28dee0fcf203cee24659a0
Change-Id: Ie15c811f9cfcae7ede28dee0fcf203cee24659a0
(cherry picked from commit e6436d7bf0)
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Merged-In: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
(cherry picked from commit 03b5185b88)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: got ORV already.
When there is a runtime depedency (via runtime_libs property) to a
library providing stable C APIs, the dependency is considered as
crossing APEX boundary. Therefore, the requested lib doesn't need to be
made available to the APEX where the requesting lib is in.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp, approved there.
Bug: 147813447
Test: m
Merged-In: I9cf8a5877850fb85b92c851e15fac921b8b7641b
(cherry picked from commit 323a4c3ab3)
Change-Id: I9cf8a5877850fb85b92c851e15fac921b8b7641b
NativeBridgeRelativePath should be appended after /bin or /lib and
before subdir.
Bug: N/A
Test: m (add a soong test)
Change-Id: Id0c44c66b4900caa291e816cf3361fdec8ff9421
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp/master
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Merged-In: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
(cherry picked from commit 5e9013be22)
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Merged-In: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
(cherry picked from commit 7bd9444b0f)
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
sdk_version is passed for relevant variants.
If not specified or "current",
it maps to "10000" for platform variants, and
"min_sdk_version" of the apex for apex variants.
Bug: 150860940
Test: m (soong test)
manually check build.ninja
Change-Id: I5102ab0c5086b5ad29d16ac45af55d32062167b4
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
apex { name: "foo" }
override_apex { name: "override_foo", base:"foo" }
PRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES := foo:com.android.foo
Previously, the override was done only for the overridden package "foo",
but not for "override_foo". Fixing this issue by using ctx.ModuleName()
when finding the package name to use.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 150645663
Test: m
Merged-In: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
(cherry picked from commit a519c54dd3)
Change-Id: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
apex { name: "foo" }
override_apex { name: "override_foo", base:"foo" }
PRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES := foo:com.android.foo
Previously, the override was done only for the overridden package "foo",
but not for "override_foo". Fixing this issue by using ctx.ModuleName()
when finding the package name to use.
Bug: 150645663
Test: m
Change-Id: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
This is rarely used feature but cost alot for the local build and build
inra.
Bug: 150506627
Test: m
Change-Id: Iec3ada4a97c7b228f2818563fa0e81b407f2715a
When there is a runtime depedency (via runtime_libs property) to a
library providing stable C APIs, the dependency is considered as
crossing APEX boundary. Therefore, the requested lib doesn't need to be
made available to the APEX where the requesting lib is in.
Bug: 147813447
Test: m
Change-Id: I9cf8a5877850fb85b92c851e15fac921b8b7641b
If an APEX contains APKs and the manifest package name of the APKs are
overridden (either via override_android_app
orPRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES), that the path to the APK
(relative in the APEX) and the overridden manifest package name is
recorded in the bundle config file.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from master
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Merged-In: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
(cherry picked from commit cfaa1643e8)
Change-Id: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
bundle config file for apexes are auto-generated. It is included in the
<apex>-base.zip file, which is expected to be extracted and then fed
into the bundletool.
This change is in preparation for the upcoming change to include
information about embedded apks in the bundle confir file.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from master
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Merged-In: If25d75e0f62036dc777faf8593ed8eb9a74950b0
(cherry picked from commit bd15961043)
Change-Id: If25d75e0f62036dc777faf8593ed8eb9a74950b0
If an APEX contains APKs and the manifest package name of the APKs are
overridden (either via override_android_app
orPRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES), that the path to the APK
(relative in the APEX) and the overridden manifest package name is
recorded in the bundle config file.
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Change-Id: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
bundle config file for apexes are auto-generated. It is included in the
<apex>-base.zip file, which is expected to be extracted and then fed
into the bundletool.
This change is in preparation for the upcoming change to include
information about embedded apks in the bundle confir file.
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Change-Id: If25d75e0f62036dc777faf8593ed8eb9a74950b0
Which is the list of JNI libraries that are embeded inside the apex.
jni_libs is handled just like native_shared_libs except that it is
stored in apex_manifest.
When linkerconfig finds an apex with JNI libs, it exposes the namespace
for the apex as visible so that libnativeloader can link the namespace
to the corresponding classloader-namespace.
Bug: 149363889
Test: m nothing(runs soong test)
Change-Id: I52ebe38b44545e6e8853e34a3404a235c858112a
ensureExactContent shouldn't return immediately when it finds a match
from expected list of files.
Bug: N/A
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ie15c811f9cfcae7ede28dee0fcf203cee24659a0
Because APK-in-APEX embeds its jni_libs in it. We don't have to follow
deps of jni_libs.
Bug: 146992436
Test: m com.android.tethering
deapexer extract com.android.tethering.apex apex
ls apex # there should be no /lib dir
Merged-In: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
Change-Id: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
(cherry picked from commit b7bebe2616)
Because APK-in-APEX embeds its jni_libs in it. We don't have to follow
deps of jni_libs.
Bug: 146992436
Test: m com.android.tethering
deapexer extract com.android.tethering.apex apex
ls apex # there should be no /lib dir
Change-Id: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
