The intention before was to use relative paths to a partition where a
config is defined. However, jars in /system_ext partition are planned to
be declared in /system's classpaths.proto config.
Bug: 180105615
Test: derive_classpath_test, CtsClasspathsTestCases
Change-Id: Icc3e1a903c34187cfcd67a3ae7bc3dd746445c03
- All contents of the fragment are added as java_lib dependencies.
- Generated classpaths.proto is added into etc as required.
Bug: 180105615
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I8e8e8b019c4ca2909182f205a47deffa946de6da
Change-Id: I8e8e8b019c4ca2909182f205a47deffa946de6da
(cherry picked from commit 333a1732b1)
Similar to bcp_fragment's contents, this property lists all java library
contributions made by this fragment.
Bug: 180105615
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ifb1f54d5db290fffaa31933d15207014bb72d2fb
Change-Id: Ifb1f54d5db290fffaa31933d15207014bb72d2fb
(cherry picked from commit 9366a053da)
The new info struct can be easily shared with systemserverclasspath
fragments.
Bug: 180105615
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I9986e64fdf19f4168da63c156de3dc9bcafac8d8
Change-Id: I9986e64fdf19f4168da63c156de3dc9bcafac8d8
(cherry picked from commit 14e49130bb)
This would allow to start introducing these modules for apexes that
contribute to SYSTEMSERVERCLASSPATH.
In follow up, it will be evolved:
- platform_systemserverclasspath would have "fragments" property to
list all individual systemserverclasspath_fragments;
- systemserverclasspath_fragment would have "contents" property to list
contibuting java libs;
- systemserverclasspath_fragment would generate non-empty
classpaths.proto config within individual apexes.
Bug: 180105615
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ibaaa3fae5f1eab9a41ceecc1214a53be6bbc8ba6
Change-Id: Ibaaa3fae5f1eab9a41ceecc1214a53be6bbc8ba6
(cherry picked from commit aa86bac2b0)
Consider this case:
apex {
name: "com.android.foo",
native_libs: ["foo"],
}
override_apex {
name: "com.mycompany.android.foo",
base: "com.android.foo",
}
cc_library {
name: "foo",
}
There are two APEXes defined: "com.android.foo" and
"com.mycompany.android.foo" which is a copy of "com.android.foo" with
some properties overridden (e.g. signing keys).
The module "foo" is mutated into two variants by the apex mutator: the
platform variant and the apex variant. The former has the variation name
"" and the later has "apex<min_api_ver>" which usually is "apex10000".
Internally, the apex variant has an alias "com.android.foo".
ApexInfo.InApexVariants() returns only "com.android.foo" when called for
the module "foo".
We can see that the information that "foo" is also part of
"com.mycompany.android.foo" is completely lost. This is causing problem
when we compare the apex membership by their "soong module name", not
the "apex name". In the example above, the two modules have different
soone module names, but have the same apex name: "com.android.foo".
To fix that, this CL introduces a new field `InApexes` to the `ApexInfo`
struct. It has the actual name of the APEXes that the module is part of.
With the example above, `InApexes` is ["com.android.foo",
"com.mycompany.android.foo"].
Bug: 180325915
Test: m nothing
Test: m nothing on non-AOSP targets with ag/13740887 applied.
Change-Id: I4e7a7ac5495d2e622ba92a4358ed967e066c6c2e
.. in preparation for the upcoming change. This change doesn't alter any
behavior.
InApexes is a misleading name. People expects that it has the list of
soong module names of the APEXes that a module is part of. So, for
example, `core-oj` is a part of both `com.android.art` and
`com.google.android.art`. However, in reality, that's not true. The
field has `com.android.art` only. This is because the two APEXes
(android and Google) have the same apex name which is `com.android.art`.
That apex name is used in various places like the `apex_available` and
allows us to keep using the same name regardless of whether the APEX is
overridden or not.
However, this is causing problems in some cases where the exact list of
soong module names is required. The upcoming change will add a new field
to handle the case and the new field actually will get the name
'InApexes'. So, the existing field is renamed to a less misleading name
`InApexVariants`.
Bug: 180325915
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I0c73361b452eddb812acd5ebef5dcedaab382436
In order for the bootclasspath_fragment to perform dex encoding on its
contents it needs to know whether the dex file is uncompressed or not.
This change makes that information available by passing it to
initHiddenAPI, storing it in hiddenAPI struct and providing access
through the hiddenAPIModule.
Bug: 179354495
Test: m droid
Merged-In: I913416b4836766de194203fd8ed5124b61dfa3dd
Change-Id: I913416b4836766de194203fd8ed5124b61dfa3dd
(cherry picked from commit 1bbd0626f2)
Now that the individual modules no longer participate in the generation
of the monolithic files it is no longer necessary to select a single
primary module to provide the information they need.
Bug: 179354495
Test: m droid
Merged-In: If09796de710927e3e3f2ccecad0b57ca5fce5dc9
Change-Id: If09796de710927e3e3f2ccecad0b57ca5fce5dc9
(cherry picked from commit 45897dd663)
These two methods did very similar jobs and merging them together
simplifies the behavior.
Bug: 179354495
Test: m droid
Merged-In: Ibe1a23d54105e6a0e5693079cd8743679301fc85
Change-Id: Ibe1a23d54105e6a0e5693079cd8743679301fc85
(cherry picked from commit 74d18d1d6f)
The configurationName was intended to separate the name of the module
from the name used in configuration (such as BootJars) so that the
child implementation library of a java_sdk_library on the bootclasspath
would have hidden API encoding performed on it just as for the main
java_library embedded within the java_sdk_library.
While that did use to work it no longer does as the test added in the
preceding change proves. It is not surprising that this regression does
not appear to have caused any issues as the the child implementation
library is only a build time artifact and not used at runtime.
In future the only modules that will require hidden API encoding are
those that are part of a bootclasspath module so there is no point in
maintaining this capability.
Bug: 179354495
Test: m droid
Merged-In: Ief8136fa9e98600cdd8d36108ec22edc2ebd7c69
Change-Id: Ief8136fa9e98600cdd8d36108ec22edc2ebd7c69
(cherry picked from commit 66cdbf07ef)
Fill a hole in the testing of hidden API encoding. Some comments in the
code indicate that the child implementation java_library of a
java_sdk_library should have hidden API flags encoded in its dex jar
just like the embedded java_library. However, this test proves that it
is not working. This will be fixed in a follow up change.
Bug: 179354495
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ia581a17f1e48dff252d17f16bf76adf039f46b60
Change-Id: Ia581a17f1e48dff252d17f16bf76adf039f46b60
(cherry picked from commit 0d586581d1)
For running dex2oat on the target_files, the paths should be use the
device install path instead of the path starting with $(OUT).
So add usesTargetFiles option and basePath option which indicates
extracted path. With those options, the path is replaced with
$(basePath)/$(device path)
And also, add DexPreoptImageDeviceLocations in the config which refers
to the boot image path(without arch) on the device. Because
DexPreoptImage related device path was missing.
Bug: 158843648
Test: dexpreopt_gen -usesTargetFiles -basePath (extract path) and then
check if paths in the generated shell script are based on on-device
path.
Change-Id: I9667fadbf3b7c6f770e0d1bcbee5d67c1ecd8a3d
Merged-In: I9667fadbf3b7c6f770e0d1bcbee5d67c1ecd8a3d
(cherry picked from commit 4dda75e73e)
* changes:
Add systemserverclasspath_fragments property to apex.
Add "contents" property to systemserverclasspath_fragment.
Move classpaths.proto related info into a separate provider.
- All contents of the fragment are added as java_lib dependencies.
- Generated classpaths.proto is added into etc as required.
Bug: 180105615
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I8e8e8b019c4ca2909182f205a47deffa946de6da
Similar to bcp_fragment's contents, this property lists all java library
contributions made by this fragment.
Bug: 180105615
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ifb1f54d5db290fffaa31933d15207014bb72d2fb
The new info struct can be easily shared with systemserverclasspath
fragments.
Bug: 180105615
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I9986e64fdf19f4168da63c156de3dc9bcafac8d8
Hidden API processing of a bootclasspath_fragment requires the fragment
provides information, such as dependencies on other fragments and flag
files to override the default flags. Failing to do so will cause hidden
API generation to either fail or to generate different flags to that
generated by the hidden API processing done by platform_bootclasspath
which will cause the build to fail.
Previously, this was handled by only performing hidden API processing
for those modules that provide stub libs and relied on there only being
bootclasspath_fragments defined for ART (which already supports hidden
API processing), and Conscrypt and I18n neither of which provide stubs.
Unfortunately, that can no longer be relied upon due to a couple of
recent changes:
1. A java_sdk_library in a bootclasspath_fragment's content property is
automatically treated a stub library. That avoids duplication for
most bootclasspath_fragments that provide the implementation and
stub libraries through the same java_sdk_library. It does not affect
either ART, conscrypt or i18n as they all define the implementation
separately to the stubs.
2. bootclasspath_fragment modules have been defined for a number of
android modules as they are needed for reasons other than hidden API
processing.
In combination this meant that rules to perform hidden API processing
were being created but they were not currently being used which is
good because they fail.
However, adding the fragment to the platform-bootclasspath will cause
those rules to be used as the platform_bootclasspath module performs a
consistency check on the hidden API flags generated by each of the
fragments to ensure that they are consistent with those it generates
itself.
The dynamic bootclasspath work will need to add fragments to the
platform_bootclasspath and without this change that would be blocked
until all fragments had been switched to generating hidden API flags
properly.
This change adds a new fragments property to the bootclasspath and
disables hidden API processing for everything other than ART and tests
if the fragments property or stub libs is empty.
Bug: 179354495
Test: - Before making this change.
- Add com.android.os.statds-bootclasspath-fragment to platform-bootclasspath.fragments
m out/soong/hiddenapi/hiddenapi-flags.csv
- hidden API processing fails in statsd as it cannot find java.lang.Object.
- After making this change, run the above command again and it should pass.
Merged-In: Ifbb362f8fcfb2c06595fbd5ae39421b536e329ef
Change-Id: Ifbb362f8fcfb2c06595fbd5ae39421b536e329ef
(cherry picked from commit 70cfdff3da)
This would allow to start introducing these modules for apexes that
contribute to SYSTEMSERVERCLASSPATH.
In follow up, it will be evolved:
- platform_systemserverclasspath would have "fragments" property to
list all individual systemserverclasspath_fragments;
- systemserverclasspath_fragment would have "contents" property to list
contibuting java libs;
- systemserverclasspath_fragment would generate non-empty
classpaths.proto config within individual apexes.
Bug: 180105615
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ibaaa3fae5f1eab9a41ceecc1214a53be6bbc8ba6
In order for the bootclasspath_fragment to perform dex encoding on its
contents it needs to know whether the dex file is uncompressed or not.
This change makes that information available by passing it to
initHiddenAPI, storing it in hiddenAPI struct and providing access
through the hiddenAPIModule.
Bug: 179354495
Test: m droid
Change-Id: I913416b4836766de194203fd8ed5124b61dfa3dd
Now that the individual modules no longer participate in the generation
of the monolithic files it is no longer necessary to select a single
primary module to provide the information they need.
Bug: 179354495
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If09796de710927e3e3f2ccecad0b57ca5fce5dc9
These two methods did very similar jobs and merging them together
simplifies the behavior.
Bug: 179354495
Test: m droid
Change-Id: Ibe1a23d54105e6a0e5693079cd8743679301fc85
The configurationName was intended to separate the name of the module
from the name used in configuration (such as BootJars) so that the
child implementation library of a java_sdk_library on the bootclasspath
would have hidden API encoding performed on it just as for the main
java_library embedded within the java_sdk_library.
While that did use to work it no longer does as the test added in the
preceding change proves. It is not surprising that this regression does
not appear to have caused any issues as the the child implementation
library is only a build time artifact and not used at runtime.
In future the only modules that will require hidden API encoding are
those that are part of a bootclasspath module so there is no point in
maintaining this capability.
Bug: 179354495
Test: m droid
Change-Id: Ief8136fa9e98600cdd8d36108ec22edc2ebd7c69
Fill a hole in the testing of hidden API encoding. Some comments in the
code indicate that the child implementation java_library of a
java_sdk_library should have hidden API flags encoded in its dex jar
just like the embedded java_library. However, this test proves that it
is not working. This will be fixed in a follow up change.
Bug: 179354495
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ia581a17f1e48dff252d17f16bf76adf039f46b60
Hidden API processing of a bootclasspath_fragment requires the fragment
provides information, such as dependencies on other fragments and flag
files to override the default flags. Failing to do so will cause hidden
API generation to either fail or to generate different flags to that
generated by the hidden API processing done by platform_bootclasspath
which will cause the build to fail.
Previously, this was handled by only performing hidden API processing
for those modules that provide stub libs and relied on there only being
bootclasspath_fragments defined for ART (which already supports hidden
API processing), and Conscrypt and I18n neither of which provide stubs.
Unfortunately, that can no longer be relied upon due to a couple of
recent changes:
1. A java_sdk_library in a bootclasspath_fragment's content property is
automatically treated a stub library. That avoids duplication for
most bootclasspath_fragments that provide the implementation and
stub libraries through the same java_sdk_library. It does not affect
either ART, conscrypt or i18n as they all define the implementation
separately to the stubs.
2. bootclasspath_fragment modules have been defined for a number of
android modules as they are needed for reasons other than hidden API
processing.
In combination this meant that rules to perform hidden API processing
were being created but they were not currently being used which is
good because they fail.
However, adding the fragment to the platform-bootclasspath will cause
those rules to be used as the platform_bootclasspath module performs a
consistency check on the hidden API flags generated by each of the
fragments to ensure that they are consistent with those it generates
itself.
The dynamic bootclasspath work will need to add fragments to the
platform_bootclasspath and without this change that would be blocked
until all fragments had been switched to generating hidden API flags
properly.
This change adds a new fragments property to the bootclasspath and
disables hidden API processing for everything other than ART and tests
if the fragments property or stub libs is empty.
Bug: 179354495
Test: - Before making this change.
- Add com.android.os.statds-bootclasspath-fragment to platform-bootclasspath.fragments
m out/soong/hiddenapi/hiddenapi-flags.csv
- hidden API processing fails in statsd as it cannot find java.lang.Object.
- After making this change, run the above command again and it should pass.
Change-Id: Ifbb362f8fcfb2c06595fbd5ae39421b536e329ef
