* changes:
Move fuzzer's CollectAllSharedDependencies into GenerateAndroidBuildActions
Support AllowMissingDependencies in prebuilt_apex modules
Support AllowMissingDependencies for apex dependencies
Add AllowMissingDependencies support for prebuilt_etc module with no src property
Make OutputFileForModule work for AllowMissingDependencies
Fix panics when target arch is riscv64
Apexes for new architectures have to increase their minSdkVersion
to the minimum supported version for the architecture.
Bug: 250918230
Test: lunch aosp_riscv64-userdebug && m ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true nothing
Change-Id: I49220cbec628f1508709741dc56b62aaac7786d9
Arch-specfic prebuilt_apex modules may be missing prebuilts for new
architectures. Mark the module as missing dependencies and allow
build analysis to continue when AllowMissingDependencies is set.
Bug: 250918230
Test: lunch aosp_riscv64-userdebug && m ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true nothing
Change-Id: I79f0c20a0c9443fe443f9ed9bc846aa649f6b6a6
Use android.OutputFileForModule instead of cc.Module.OutputFile,
which will already handle the AllowMissingDependencies case.
Bug: 250918230
Test: lunch aosp_riscv64-userdebug && m ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true nothing
Change-Id: I605ae9afe06ac450adec1d2a856e529e45ed5cb5
Fix panics in api_level.go and apex.go when using riscv64 as the target
arch.
Bug: 250918230
Test: lunch aosp_riscv64-userdebug && m ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true nothing
Change-Id: I85c7685f3d14fa2dc7ffbcdea7f490feca304ef7
The certificate module is handled the same in Soong between android apps
and apexes, so share the bp2build code as well.
There are a few changes in this CL:
- If override_apex.certificate is unset, the generated apex also unsets
it. This prevents the generated apex from using the base apex's
certificate, which is most likely incorrect (e.g. google variant using
the cert for the aosp variant). Instead, rely on the default
certificate handling in the macro.
- If the certificate prop is a string, then it gets generated into
certificate_name in order to disambiguate. This behavior is identical
to android_app.
Test: added various unit tests.
Bug: 249089160
Fixes: 249089160
Change-Id: I99e18964ff546429a985d0f64dc21e2c69d35d9d
This change fixes a bug that base APK of an AppSet is not put into the
APEX.
Bug: 236299724
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I1010ec66d8551fcc1e2d9119be7ecdba22186607
This allows apex_set's set config to use other soong modules as a dependency
Bug:249169376
Change-Id: I8da20c6f474328d63d9aa3811f94e3e04b89ea4c
Test: Added a test case to check soong module assignment to the set field of an apks_set rule
When an app_set module is included in an APEX, we don't use its
`builtFile` which is the main APK, , but `PackedAdditionalOutputs()`
which is the zip file where all APK files (main + additional) files are
packed. We then unzip them into the corresponding directory inside the
APEX.
However, `buildFile` still has been used when constructing
canned_fs_config whose content should match with what are actually
included in the APEX. Fixing the bug by using
`PackedAdditionalOutputs()` instead.
Bug: 236299724
Test: m nothing (apex_test.go amended)
Test: follow https://buganizer.corp.google.com/issues/236299724#comment34
* mkdir for-236299724
* cd for-236299724
* repo init -u https://android.googlesource.com/platform/manifest -b
* master --partial-clone --clone-filter=blob:none
* repo sync -c -j8
* unzip -l ~/Downloads/mainline_t_2022_jun_t1004275.zip | cut -c31- | grep | xargs rm -f
* unzip ~/Downloads/mainline_t_2022_jun_t1004275.zip
* source build/envsetup.sh
* choosecombo 1 aosp_arm64 userdebug
* m com.android.extservices.gms
Change-Id: If9752c07748300dbb963568de4e879b041b0a206
Also remove the soong hack that allowed us to build during the
transition
Bug: 243054261
Test: build + TH
Merged-In: I60bac1ec687f03a38f38240969a1c38a8e5bf92c
Change-Id: I60bac1ec687f03a38f38240969a1c38a8e5bf92c
Also remove the soong hack that allowed us to build during the
transition
Bug: 243054261
Test: build + TH
Change-Id: I60bac1ec687f03a38f38240969a1c38a8e5bf92c
On coverage builds, R8 will fail to properly optimize and fail the build
if ignore_warnings: false, because jacoco injects dependencies on
jacocoagent classes, but the jacocoagent library is not part of the
classpath libraries passed in to R8 in its arguments.
Instead we can add jacocoagent as a libs dependency for these modules so
that it will get pulled into the r8 flags.
Bug: 243903417
Test: m
Change-Id: Icc24cc260b896fc800125a0318308d823ccf7a83
On coverage builds, R8 will fail to properly optimize and fail the build
if ignore_warnings: false, because jacoco injects dependencies on
jacocoagent classes, but the jacocoagent library is not part of the
classpath libraries passed in to R8 in its arguments.
Instead we can add jacocoagent as a libs dependency for these modules so
that it will get pulled into the r8 flags.
Bug: 243903417
Test: add optimize.ignore_warnings: false to NetworkStackAppDefaults &&
make SKIP_ABI_CHECKS=true PRODUCT=cf_x86_phone-userdebug \
EMMA_INSTRUMENT=true EMMA_INSTRUMENT_FRAMEWORK=true \
CLANG_COVERAGE=true COVERAGE_PATHS="" \
TARGET_USERDATAIMAGE_PARTITION_SIZE=17179869184 \
SKIP_BOOT_JARS_CHECK=true \
NetworkStack
Change-Id: I71313b1fd35437ec52890f5c30b3fd1381c7c3d2
Currently, DCLA is built in rapid. With new train build, DCLA will be
directly built in soong, just like a regular module, refer to
b/239679485. In old rapid built DCLA, native shared libs are placed the
following way inside apex:
/lib(64)?/foo.so/<sha256 foo.so>/foo.so
The sha256 hash is used to differentiate different libs. To ensure the
same lib placement in soong built DCLA, three changes are made:
(1) in apex.go, added an apex soong module property called
dynamic_common_lib_apex to indicate if this apex is a DCLA
(2) in builder.go, update apexRule to call into run_apexer binary
instead of apexer binary. run_apexer binary is a wrapper of apexer
binary. If it is DCLA, the wrapper binary will place the native
shared libs in desired location and update canned_fs_config accordingly.
TEST: manuualy added this field to adbd. Local build by banchan
and then inspect the payload image contensts. All libs are proprely
placed.
BUG: 241096765
Change-Id: I2a5e7ea75a6e9a7af1932ff7dccb9dc3a3785db9
Introduce cc_api_library, which reflects imported API from other
inner-tree. This cc_api_library module type will later refer from
the other ninja module which generates stub library from the interface
description.
Tested environment :
* original libc definition has been removed temporarily, to ensure that
imported api stub library is being used from build
* Added new definition of libc as below
cc_api_library {
name: "libc",
arch: {
x86: {
src: "libs/x86/libc.so",
},
x86_64: {
src: "libs/x86_64/libc.so",
},
},
header_libs: [
"libc_headers",
],
export_header_lib_headers: ["libc_headers"],
min_sdk_version: "9",
vendor_available: true,
}
Bug: 236087698
Test: `ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true m vendorimage` succeeded
Change-Id: I67070b0f3561aa2afd73b6c1c0fdf4255218baac
apex_toolchain through soong_injection.
This is necessary to keep both Bazel and Soong in sync.
Test: presubmit
Bug: 238723069
Fixes: 238153998
Change-Id: Ibf4a8ed91d358dc7800c10e4112485a52f0606bb
The default version needs to be used by both apex and apk updatable
modules. Moving it to android package so it can be accessed without
circular dependencies.
Test: presubmit
Bug: 231691162
Change-Id: Icafd50d0b065e89a115ae9c9b6ea55adf2730b49
Merged-In: Icafd50d0b065e89a115ae9c9b6ea55adf2730b49
* Add ApexCqueryInfo to obtain apex artifacts used by the makefile
generator and downstream modules
* Refactor code common to GenerateAndroidBuildActions and ProcessBazelQueryResponse
* Implement android.MixedBuildBuildable for modules
* Enable mixed build for apex modules with payload_type:"image"
The first take 6a2b7c40b was setting compressed APEX suffix incorrectly, and
was reverted in 8a3c91494.
Fixes: 239925080 239695521 232085015
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I1720f8db3c7cc773183d25a815d9b7eeaf7c73ad
