Enforce min_sdk_version for every payload dependency of updatable
APEX/APKs.
android.CheckMinSdkVersion() calls ApexModule.ShouldSupportSdkVersion
for every transitive dependency from APEX/APK modules to see if it
meets the min_sdk_version requirements.
The common implementation for apex/android_app is provided in
android/apex.go.
Bug: 145796956
Bug: 152655956
Bug: 153333044
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I4a947dc94026df7cebd552b6e8ccdb4cc1f67170
Make uses NATIVE_COVERAGE to enable gcov coverage and CLANG_COVERAGE
to enable clang coverage. NATIVE_COVERAGE is translated to the Soong
Native_coverage product variable which triggers the native_coverage
clause in Android.bp files. The clause also needs to be triggered
for CLANG_COVERAGE.
Rename the existing Native_coverage product variable to GcovCoverage,
and regenerate Native_coverage when either GcovCoverage or
ClangCoverage are set.
Also remove NativeLineCoverage, it wasn't doing anything differently
than Native_coverage.
Bug: 159059537
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: I215124a9b35a2ad50ad562079d392e3d33da11f4
Because override_apex can modify the contents of the base apex,
allowed_files (which describes the contents) should be overridable.
Bug: 159503079
Bug: 159392784
Bug: 158169437
Test: m (soong test added)
Merged-In: I12744b0465dc3cfc90a66643867e65b4092cd0f7
Change-Id: I12744b0465dc3cfc90a66643867e65b4092cd0f7
(cherry picked from commit faa5399b3f)
Previously, when a boot jar was provided by a java_sdk_library_import
module the check-boot-jars check failed because the file it depended on
was not available. In an incremental build the build failed due to the
file in the out directory not having a rule to generate it.
That was because the module was named prebuilt_<module>.<apex> instead
of <module>.<apex>. This was fixed by simply removing prebuilt_ prefix
from the name if it was present.
After fixing that the check-boot-jars still did not work properly
because it was expecting a jar file containing .class files but instead
was given a jar file containing .dex files which meant the check did
not work properly.
This was fixed by defining a new ApexDependency interface for use by
the apex/apex.go code to use instead of java.Dependency for generating
the androidmk entries. The *SdkLibraryImport type then implemented
those, by delegating to the implementation library.
Bug: 158304459
Bug: 159112414
Test: m check-boot-jars
m checkbuild
manual inspection of the .jar file used by check-boot-jars to
ensure it contained .class files and not .dex files.
Change-Id: I545c5c9072dd472337d2f9b4dfdf08f53c981662
Merged-In: I545c5c9072dd472337d2f9b4dfdf08f53c981662
Because override_apex can modify the contents of the base apex,
allowed_files (which describes the contents) should be overridable.
Bug: 159503079
Bug: 159392784
Bug: 158169437
Test: m (soong test added)
Change-Id: I12744b0465dc3cfc90a66643867e65b4092cd0f7
Previously, when there is apex_set that is overriding another module,
the entry for the overridden module is removed from apexkeys.txt.
However, this is wrong because the existence of the apex_set module
doesn't necessary mean that the module is insatalled instead of the
overridden module. That is determined by PRODUCT_PACKAGES which Soong
has no knowledge of. Therefore, we don't delete the entry for the
overridden (actually possibly overridable) modules in the file.
Bug: 158729168
Test: m
Merged-In: I85d0c756f862323bae556bf657d66ec50038985f
(cherry picked from commit ac5e79f900)
Change-Id: I85d0c756f862323bae556bf657d66ec50038985f
Q+ and R+ mainline modules may only add code in a restricted set of Java
package prefixes, that may never be changed.
If a mainline module owns the Java package prefix "foo.bar", it may have
classes in "foo.bar", "foo.bar.baz", "foo.bar.baz.bat" etc.
Test: m
Bug: 156725734
Change-Id: I30bf510ed473309871469bf439d7c81575450931
Previously, when there is apex_set that is overriding another module,
the entry for the overridden module is removed from apexkeys.txt.
However, this is wrong because the existence of the apex_set module
doesn't necessary mean that the module is insatalled instead of the
overridden module. That is determined by PRODUCT_PACKAGES which Soong
has no knowledge of. Therefore, we don't delete the entry for the
overridden (actually possibly overridable) modules in the file.
Bug: 158729168
Test: m
Change-Id: I85d0c756f862323bae556bf657d66ec50038985f
Previously, when a boot jar was provided by a java_sdk_library_import
module the check-boot-jars check failed because the file it depended on
was not available. In an incremental build the build failed due to the
file in the out directory not having a rule to generate it.
That was because the module was named prebuilt_<module>.<apex> instead
of <module>.<apex>. This was fixed by simply removing prebuilt_ prefix
from the name if it was present.
After fixing that the check-boot-jars still did not work properly
because it was expecting a jar file containing .class files but instead
was given a jar file containing .dex files which meant the check did
not work properly.
This was fixed by defining a new ApexDependency interface for use by
the apex/apex.go code to use instead of java.Dependency for generating
the androidmk entries. The *SdkLibraryImport type then implemented
those, by delegating to the implementation library.
Bug: 158304459
Bug: 159112414
Test: m check-boot-jars
m checkbuild
manual inspection of the .jar file used by check-boot-jars to
ensure it contained .class files and not .dex files.
Change-Id: I545c5c9072dd472337d2f9b4dfdf08f53c981662
apex_sets is a new module type that can be used to deliver pre-signed
APEXes, which previously could be done only via prebuilt_apex.
Soon gnow understands apex_sets module types and emits the signing info
of the modules to apexkeys.txt
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pic from AOSP
Bug: 158729168
Test: m
Merged-In: I9507375342ec053309660d94c931a79bf4f21218
(cherry picked from commit 8d6c51ebcc)
Change-Id: I9507375342ec053309660d94c931a79bf4f21218
If a java_sdk_library_import has a corresponding java_sdk_library then
make the java_sdk_library_import export both the xml and impl modules
created by the java_sdk_library.
Makes java_sdk_library_import consistent with java_sdk_library by
providing libraries within the same APEX access to the implementation
library instead of the stubs.
Bug: 158304459
Test: m nothing
Test what happens when building com.android.tethering with and without
a preferred "framework-tethering" java_sdk_library_import. Make sure that
it does not change the generated APEX.
Merged-In: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
Change-Id: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
(cherry picked from commit eedc5d55ce)
Don't emit an empty LOCAL_OVERRIDES_MODULES line if APEX is not
overriding any module.
Test: TH noop
Change-Id: I7abbaccd54bf2ffa25a6c798260c81284ea5ecb2
If a java_sdk_library_import has a corresponding java_sdk_library then
make the java_sdk_library_import export both the xml and impl modules
created by the java_sdk_library.
Makes java_sdk_library_import consistent with java_sdk_library by
providing libraries within the same APEX access to the implementation
library instead of the stubs.
Bug: 158304459
Test: m nothing
Test what happens when building com.android.tethering with and without
a preferred "framework-tethering" java_sdk_library_import. Make sure that
it does not change the generated APEX.
Change-Id: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
While libz has stubs for other mainline modules, it doesn't provide
stubs when it is used as a VNDK lib.
In general, VNDK libs are only for vendor modules. So, we skip them even
if they have stubs.
Bug: 155456180
Test: m com.android.vndk.current
provideNativeLibs of the APEX should be empty
Change-Id: I22401a2b1732a8560802c5be850181682e183a8e
apex_sets is a new module type that can be used to deliver pre-signed
APEXes, which previously could be done only via prebuilt_apex.
Soon gnow understands apex_sets module types and emits the signing info
of the modules to apexkeys.txt
Bug: 158729168
Test: m
Change-Id: I9507375342ec053309660d94c931a79bf4f21218
Ida6f7bb784efe74cc1fa0e8d370eaee803f08b0f made it possible to add
dex_import modules into apex, but that change had a bug. When creating
Android.mk for the dex_import module, the code executed an unchecked
type assertion to convert java.DexImport to java.Dependency, which
cannot be successful. This change fixes the bug by doing a checked type
assertion instead.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from AOSP
Bug: 157886942
Test: m (test added)
Merged-In: Id22c20d42effce539fab10b0d349bf340d467f02
(cherry picked from commit 9e83f0b531)
Change-Id: Id22c20d42effce539fab10b0d349bf340d467f02
