There are a couple of instances in apex/ and java/ that rely on the naming
convention that the jars exported by prebuilt apexes follow the name of
the java_sdk_library_import, minus the prebuilt_ prefix. With muliple
module sdk prebuilts in trunk stable, this naming convention might not
be valid. Use `source_module_name` instead.
```
prebuilt_sscp_fragment {name: "", contents: ["service-foo.v2"]}
java_import {name: "service-foo.v2", source_module_name: "service-foo"},
```
We should use service-foo and not service-foo.v2 because
1. The prebuilt apex contains service-foo.dex
2. PRODUCT_*JARS will contain service-foo and not service-foo.v2
For clarity, this CL does not drop the current mechanism where prebuilt bcp
fragments create a dependency edge to prebuilt java or java_sdk_library
imports. There is still some discussion around whether we can remove
that completely (b/320711431). If we were to do that, then the
Android.bp files will become
```
prebuilt_sscp_fragment {name: "", contents: ["service-foo"]}
```
Bug: 322175508
Test: Added a unit test
Test: In internal, lunch cf_x86_64_only_phone-next-userdebug && m
nothing # .ninja files identical
Test: In internal, created a parallel set of v2 prebuilts of
java_sdk_library_import and prebuilt_bcp_fragments for adservices && m
nothing # build passes
Change-Id: Ia899d75e826fa1a559368d706eaa65835f748d40
161e468774