* changes:
Only assert-max-image-size for static partitions.
sparse_img.py --get_partition_size return size of partition
Revert "Fix dynamic partition size check for devices with recovery"
If TARGET_USERIMAGES_SPARSE_EXT_DISABLED is set, don't provide
--sparse to lpmake, so that a non-sparse super image is built.
Test: build with the flag set.
Bug: 120041578
Change-Id: I5a26e4c793b0e2ddc89e9c38c8828ac21044e78a
Merged-In: I5a26e4c793b0e2ddc89e9c38c8828ac21044e78a
assert-max-image-size doesn't make sense for
dynamic partitions, as build_image.py always find the
right size for the output image. Hence:
- build_image.py no longer need to write generated_*_info.txt
(which contains the size of the image).
- assert-max-image-size on the static BOARD_*IMAGE_PARTITION_SIZE. If
a partition is dynamic, that variable isn't set, and
assert-max-image-size becomes a no-op. If the partition is static,
assert-max-image-size checks the static partition size as it used
to be.
- Fix read-size-of-partitions to use the size of the partition by
reading the image directly (instead of using generated_*_info.txt).
For devices without AVB, with DAP enabled, and does not have
RESERVED_SIZE for partitions, because of right sizing, the original
code always warns about approaching size limits. Since such checks
doesn't make sense for dynamic partitions, remove them.
Test: builds on device with dynamic partitions
Test: builds on cuttlefish with DAP enabled (without AVB), no
more size limit warnings:
WARNING: out/target/product/vsoc_x86/vendor.img approaching size limit (X now; limit X)
Fixes: 122377935
Change-Id: I75e1b8322197cb18cf397d02aefd49d777bb6405
Also, move code from build_super_image.py to sparse_img.py.
Test: sparse_img.py on sparse and non-sparse images
Bug: 122377935
Change-Id: Ie91fdfdbb54298ea27eb20d1b5363aeb1470356e
If TARGET_USERIMAGES_SPARSE_EXT_DISABLED is set, don't provide
--sparse to lpmake, so that a non-sparse super image is built.
Test: build with the flag set.
Fixes: 120041578
Change-Id: I5a26e4c793b0e2ddc89e9c38c8828ac21044e78a
For non-A/B, you must supply the --system-item-list, --other-item-list, and
--system-misc-info-keys parameters approrpriate for merging two partial target
files. Additionally, you must supply the --rebuild-recovery option to correctly
generate the filesystem config and file contexts. With all of these parameters,
the script will generate a merged target files containing the correct recovery
files.
Also fix the --keep-tmp option to be consistent with the other options.
Bug: 122813742
Test: verify that merged target image boots and can perform OTA.
Change-Id: I5a942ac0cd9924fec419a686794a2340304594c8
This reverts commit 9788b4ed31. All the
blocking issues have been addressed.
Fixes: 120517892
Test: Run validate_target_files.py on crosshatch signed
target_files.zip.
Change-Id: I95de241e159998e002dedddafea65953b1a1b263
Previously it was following a wrong order by doing `zipalign` after
calling SignApk, which effectively compromised the signature. This CL
corrects the logic, and follows the same flow as in build system:
- Pack APEX file;
- `zipalign -f 4096`;
- Call SignApk to sign the container with `-a 4096` flag.
Bug: 129148142
Test: Run sign_target_files_apks.py on taimen target_files.zip. Boot the
image after signing.
Change-Id: I91bd3dce4f45c1891c5e122212a699f4808618fa
(cherry picked from commit 0e06cb0a8b)
Previously it was following a wrong order by doing `zipalign` after
calling SignApk, which effectively compromised the signature. This CL
corrects the logic, and follows the same flow as in build system:
- Pack APEX file;
- `zipalign -f 4096`;
- Call SignApk to sign the container with `-a 4096` flag.
Bug: 129148142
Test: Run sign_target_files_apks.py on taimen target_files.zip. Boot the
image after signing.
Change-Id: I91bd3dce4f45c1891c5e122212a699f4808618fa
To build a complete list of the dynamic partitions and partitions
groups, we need to merge the contribution from the system and other
target files.
Bug: 127687287
Test: Running merge_target_files.py and observing partition lists are
merged as expected.
Change-Id: I5bb9bd0e3179d48c9bfacdb3aca8253158f61cf6
For PRESIGNED APEXes, we should keep carrying the matching public keys
at /system/etc/security/apex.
Bug: 129148142
Test: Run sign_target_files_apks.py on a target_files.zip with presigned
APEXes. Check the output zip.
Change-Id: I2e941fd9b10e99d2db9df1e5308cbbe8c760177b
(cherry picked from commit bf3fb024cd)
For PRESIGNED APEXes, we should keep carrying the matching public keys
at /system/etc/security/apex.
Bug: 129148142
Test: Run sign_target_files_apks.py on a target_files.zip with presigned
APEXes. Check the output zip.
Change-Id: I2e941fd9b10e99d2db9df1e5308cbbe8c760177b
This change changes auto-generated RROs from DEVICE_PACKAGE_OVERLAYS
to be generated in the vendor partition, as opposed to /product where
they were generated in the past.
Note that PRODUCT_PACKAGE_OVERLAYS continue generating RRO packages
to /product, which means that a single app can be overlayed from
different partitions. These RROs have been given module and package
names based on their location.
Bug: 127758779
Test: verify noop on presubmit targets
Change-Id: I5cee70e28e3969e67b2d83eaf25d9c6e3a11102d
